Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna?

[David Hine <evad_hine@yahoo.co.uk>]

Hi Tom and Markus,

This is the very reason I am reluctant to give out the Tesla TX radio method details. The counter-arguments are already rapidly building here against it, but I can assure you those 1.6 Hz signals are not what those 'experts' say. They don't have a clue regarding this 'Tesla' ELF system technology, because they cannot leave their Marconi 'mind-sets' behind. It will simply create more endless disputes at this stage.

Harrp was a casualty of mis-interpretation of the 1.6 Hz traces on their displays, and that opened Haarp up to various very contraversial conspiracy theories. It then was 'instructed' to close by the US Government, using money funding excuses as the 'reason'. I have saved some of Haarp's 1.6 Hz 'affected' screenshots too. 

The Tesla radio TX method is totally different from Marconi's method. Marconi's radio method (the familiar one), favours higher frequencies, and Tesla's radio favours the lower frequencies. That's why Marconi's radio method only works at VLF using 'extreme' antenna sizes -Marconi antenna dimensions rapidly becoming impracticable as the frequency is lowered. I think the lowest TX frequency ever achieved by the Marconi system is around the 80 Hz for submarines, using many 100's of kilometres of 'antenna' strung across the countryside, and is still hopelessly inefficient and impractical for ELF.

Tesla's radio is the opposite, and favours frequencies as low as 1 Hz with very compact antenna dimensions (around 2 metres high, and 1 metre wide). What I want to research, is the highest frequency the Tesla system will work efficiently up to. On receiving tests, the Tesla method is good up to around 400 kHz, above which, it rapidly becomes very inefficient (upper cut off frequency). I will also set up a broadcast (AM Modulated) signal in the Long Wave broadcasting band (LF), using it to transmit music as a testing programme.

When it's all up and running on VLF / LF, I will put out various test signals using it, and join in the VLF 'fun'.

With very kind regards, David 

---

From: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Saturday, 10 February 2018, 11:58
Subject: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna?

Hi Tom, David,
I'm not aware of a functional "Tesla Antenna" concept. The mentioning of the Kiruna site suggests that those low frequency carriers might be have been created by ionospheric heating, where a powerful AM-modulated HF transmitter is used to modulate the ionospheric conductivity. In analogy to the "Luxembourg effect" where the modulation is transferred to other MF or LF signals, they can also generate detectable ELF emissions by deflecting the DC polar electrojet current. Similar experiments have been reported by the HAARP facility (Gakona AK), and the method has been suggested as a means to communicate to deeply submerged submarines.
73,
Markus, DF6NM
-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK1IS <DK1IS@kabelmail.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 10. Feb 2018 0:36
Betreff: Re: LF: Russian Alphas not QRT but QRP ?

Hi David,
most interesting! - Could you give some more information about QTH, TX and "Tesla" antenna?
Tu es 73,
Tom, DK1IS
Am 09.02.2018 um 21:44 schrieb David Hine:Hi, I do transmitting on ELF occasionally on a frequency of 1.6 Hz using a 'Tesla' antenna, giving a global range (screenshot example from Kiruna, Sweden, attached). It is likely to be a 'QSB' fade out, and at ELF, these can last for many days. I have noticed this often on my transmitted ELF signals, with a 2 week QSB period being the average.Kind regards, David

---