Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna?

[David Hine <evad_hine@yahoo.co.uk>]

Hi Luis, If you scroll back from March 2015, you will find more 1.6 Hz signals. Search the Haarp records from that period for more evidence. Look on YouTube under 'Haarp Conspiracy' to see the 1.6 and 2.5 Hz signals as received in Alaska. An ELF enthusiast in Australia received 1.6 Hz too.   

The 'Tesla' TX ran for 2 years continuously from late 2013 to 2015 and a bit. Future ELF transmissions are likely on 1.6 Hz. If you look at Kiruna daily, you will still see very occasional remaining weak 1.6 Hz echoes. I am waiting for these, and some others showing on Romagna to clear completely. That could take some time, as things happen VERY slowly below 2 Hz. The timescales and QSB fades are measured in years at those frequencies!!

I am putting effort into getting the Tesla signal out on Long Waves, and hopefully it will then be easier to study and make more sense, and ordinary domestic LW receivers can be used for monitoring.

I'm pleased there is no hostility here for this 'strange' Tesla radio, so once it's established on LW's, further progress can be made.

Perhaps it will 'usher in' a new chapter for Long Waves?

Kind regards, David. 

---

From: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <luis@vigilant.es>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Saturday, 10 February 2018, 21:38
Subject: Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna?

Hi David, Clemens, Markus. ELF ! :-O

I have searched about Kiruna observatory and found the page which shows the magnetic pulsations

daily. There is really an interesting signal at about 1.6Hz during March 2015 which can't be seen

in other months/years http://www2.irf.se/maggraphs/puls.php

A test would be quite interesting David. Do you mean you can transmit actually with your Tesla system

and leave a trace at Kiruna at >2000Km ? Or that from march 2015 was an exceptional achievement

and unique event ?

At minimum this is fascinating David. A demonstration would be very interesting. Are you able to set

the system on Tx ?

73 de Luis

EA5DOM  

---

De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] en nombre de David Hine [evad_hine@yahoo.co.uk]
Enviado: sábado, 10 de febrero de 2018 21:40
Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Asunto: Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna?

Hi Clemens, I don't understand that sort of stuff, and I just judge the antenna on its 'on air' receive and transmit performance. It sounds

like 'Marconi' technology type of 'logic', and I'm very doubtful it applies to the VLF Tesla antenna technology.

It's essential when doing 'Tesla', everything Marconi appears irrelevant, and best 'forgotten'. This causes technical disputes, and so it's

best to wait and see how it performs on Long Waves as a transmitting antenna.

Another interesting thing noticed after ELF transmissions (at 1.6 Hz), are very long delayed echoes that last for extremely long periods. The signals also get 'distorted', and the timings are also changed by the ELF propagation. Local 'mixing' with mains hums also occurs at the receiver locale, creating 'spurious' by products. This is all so different to any other type of radio. These strange 'effects' occur below 5 Hz, but the 'sprogs' spread up to 200 Hz.

These strange propagation effects may not occur at 'normal' frequencies, so that's one reason to investigate the Tesla method on ordinary VLF and Long Wave (LF).

I realise this will be 'weird' to most, and it's something that was 'forgotten' over 100 years ago, when Tesla's work was 'written out of history'. The Tesla stuff found on the web is missing much vital information, and without that, it is incomplete and does not work. I am referring to Tesla's power by wireless system, which is a VLF one.

With very kind regards, David.  

---

From: Clemens Paul <cpaul@gmx.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Saturday, 10 February 2018, 19:44
Subject: RE: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna?

Hi David,
>>Maybe you can disclose at least the the 3dB BW of this kind of antenna?
>Hi Clemens, I'm not sure I understand your question.
The 3 dB bandwidth is f0/Q and  Q is defined as X/R
where X is the reactance of the inductor and the capacitor at the
resonant frequency.
The lossless-Q of a small antenna is a useful academic quantity, and is
the reactance divided by the radiation-resistance.  It gives the maximum
theoretical Q for any given small antenna, and then the actual Q can be
measured on the real antenna.  The radiation efficiency is the lossless Q
divided by the actual Q, by the equations:
Qlossless = X/Rrad,
Qactual = X/(Rrad+Rloss),
Qactual/Qlossless = Rrad/(Rrad+Rloss) = radiation efficiency.
An interesting limit for small antennas is the minimum lossless Q that can
be achieved, and was derived by Chu in 1948 from only the frequency and
the size of the antenna.
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ


>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of David Hine
>Sent: Saturday, February 10, 2018 7:13 PM

>To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>Subject: Re: VLF: 1.6 Hz from Kiruna?
>