Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+WSPR\s+\:\s+QSO\s+or\s+not\s+QSO\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:55:36 +0100
Alberto has SPOKEN !! take notice one Shades of the recurring and silly debates that every now and then happen on the Moon-net reflector... 73 Alberto I2PHD
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00060.html (10,490 bytes)

2. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:35:25 +0000
and define unattended ... Andy www.g4jnt.com This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health and safety police
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00169.html (14,848 bytes)

3. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:36:52 +0100
Can only dream of working dx like this on cw ... 2009-11-21 13:54 9M3KKR 0.503906 -23 1 OL69 1000 G3ZJO IO92ng 8894 325 mind you after watching the movie ...perhaps machine's can dream as well ? G ..
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00320.html (14,220 bytes)

4. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:44:44 +0000 (GMT)
Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (Philip K Dick 1928 -1982) 73 petefmt -- On Sat, 21/11/09, Graham <[email protected]> wrote: From: Graham <[email protected]> Subject: Re: LF: WSPR :
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00373.html (15,854 bytes)

5. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:01:04 +0100
Of course its a new and exciting technology, but I doubt that it is on one and the same level with a regular exchange and therefore should not be considered equally verifying a valid contact. Shades
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00481.html (10,916 bytes)

6. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:38:16 +0100
Every one else is WRONG except Andy g3kev And usually based on lack of understanding / ignorance or even prejudice. Andy www.g4jnt.com This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the hea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00540.html (10,885 bytes)

7. RE: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "James Cowburn" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:18:42 +0100
How do you know they are unattended? Jim --Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of mal hamilton Sent: 21 November 2009 14:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00629.html (12,579 bytes)

8. LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "Wolf Ostwald" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:45:14 +0100
Hello group ! I am not an expert with WSPR at all. But I followed the discussion regarding false detection of calls thru the database. To my understanding the WSPR operator has NO way to really find
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00704.html (11,697 bytes)

9. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:06:21 +0000
And usually based on lack of understanding / ignorance or even prejudice. Andy www.g4jnt.com This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health and safety police
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00720.html (11,999 bytes)

10. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:59:39 +0100
Example Go to bed and leave the machines, wake up in the morning and count how many QSO'S they made, Who has the highest score to date ? Even better leave them for a week or so !! and go for the big
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00773.html (14,073 bytes)

11. RE: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "g3zjo" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:45:06 +0100
as That is the one big thing I have against WSPR, I almost begged Joe not to include any predictive (lets try and make a sensible call - qra - report out of this junk) decoding in the early days of
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00777.html (10,233 bytes)

12. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:06:29 +0100
Two unattended machines had a QSO!! Is that what you mean. g3kev CanI suggest you read thoroughly the documentation on how the mode works before making claims about the database.and validity. The dat
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00779.html (11,674 bytes)

13. Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:52:40 +0000
CanI suggest you read thoroughly the documentation on how the mode works before making claims about the database.and validity. The database can only be updated by stations decoding and reportoing, an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-11/msg00853.html (12,540 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu