To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO |
From: | "g3zjo" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:43:49 -0000 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <E9D64772E9BE481881BAED07698A8E90@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
>Can only dream of working dx like this on cw ... >2009-11-21 13:54 9M3KKR 0.503906 -23 1 OL69 1000 G3ZJO >IO92ng 8894 325 >mind you after watching the movie ...perhaps machine's can dream as >well ? That is the one big thing I have against WSPR, I almost begged Joe not to include any predictive (lets try and make a sensible call - qra - report out of this junk) decoding in the early days of the mode. Rubbish info should stay as rubbish. Who also has not seen the message - PSE QSY 10.140868975MHZ - on WSPR, when you QSY there is never anyone there:-) Eddie G3ZJO |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: SOFTROCK, M0FMT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, M0FMT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, M0FMT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |