Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO
From: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:36:43 -0000
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C8FF74A20D9540AAAF95A521083B3B12@df2py> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Every one else is WRONG except Andy

g3kev

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO


And usually based on lack of understanding / ignorance  or even prejudice.

Andy
www.g4jnt.com

This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health
and safety police



2009/11/21 Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>:
>> Of course it’s a new and exciting technology, but I doubt that it is on
>> one
>>>
>>> and the same level with a regular exchange and therefore should not be
>>> considered equally verifying a valid contact.
>
> Shades of the recurring and silly debates that every now and then happen
on
> the Moon-net reflector...
>
> 73 Alberto I2PHD
>
>
>
>
>




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>