Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO
From:	Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:01:04 +0100
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C8FF74A20D9540AAAF95A521083B3B12@df2py> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Z-usanet-msgid:	XID171NkusBi1872X38

Of course it’s a new and exciting technology, but I doubt that it is on one

and the same level with a regular exchange and therefore should not be
considered equally verifying a valid contact.


Shades of the recurring and silly debates that every now and then happen on the 
Moon-net reflector...

73  Alberto  I2PHD

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: T/A [137 kHz] good conditions !, (continued) LF: T/A [137 kHz] good conditions !, Lubos OK2BVG LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Wolf Ostwald Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Andy Talbot Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton RE: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, James Cowburn Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Andy Talbot Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Graham RE: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, g3zjo Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, M0FMT Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Alberto di Bene <= Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Andy Talbot Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton Re: LF: LF T/A [137 kHz] good conditions !, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX LF: Re: LF T/A [137 kHz] good conditions !, Marcin

Previous by Date:	LF: Tail end of XGV? 20dB over noise on 137, John RABSON
Next by Date:	LF: DI2AG daylight reports, Walter und Marianne Staubach
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, M0FMT
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]