Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO
From:	Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date:	Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:06:21 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Cv6UwYLhyqz4bUW2gp+iUfuMwDet9zF3R70cMhj9+M=; b=FekISS268bdys6Bf4P15K3fvV1W2FIGtb9mkHa4ese9S0l3OMCNH0TIZKTr3IRC5VF 9JRvSop4yPo7ChdjKJvgYAQKjy35bjblBknvF11wtNiAZOZgLNIA3ydj3+0o+2V66OD9 WHzB3rnteL5YJzS4smXk0RcLTXsdF2claaEHI=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZgRogauYJOG2DsnKPO1GLgj0Z4uOIZLCv9PARjEDSaN8LG1+3Tg3lumVO8N2CeQbaO Zn0w0NosIeV23hJr0XQO7kiyhKjxKAUCcBIPXDHFMBH8jCyh/aZnThdXpVoB13+/FmFU /gikbpzJnijyjlI7H7enR/asXSZ/yhjVnF8/g=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <C8FF74A20D9540AAAF95A521083B3B12@df2py> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

And usually based on lack of understanding / ignorance  or even prejudice.

Andy
www.g4jnt.com

This email has been scanned for damaging side-effects by the health
and safety police



2009/11/21 Alberto di Bene <[email protected]>:
>> Of course it’s a new and exciting technology, but I doubt that it is on
>> one
>>>
>>> and the same level with a regular exchange and therefore should not be
>>> considered equally verifying a valid contact.
>
> Shades of the recurring and silly debates that every now and then happen on
> the Moon-net reflector...
>
> 73  Alberto  I2PHD
>
>
>
>
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, (continued) Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Andy Talbot Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton RE: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, James Cowburn Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Andy Talbot Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Graham RE: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, g3zjo Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, M0FMT Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Alberto di Bene Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, Andy Talbot <= Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton Re: LF: LF T/A [137 kHz] good conditions !, Dexter McIntyre W4DEX LF: Re: LF T/A [137 kHz] good conditions !, Marcin

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton
Next by Date:	LF: Re: DI2AG daylight reports, Marcin
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: WSPR : QSO or not QSO, mal hamilton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]