Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+statistics\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+SAQ\s+statistics\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 10:02:35 +0000 (UTC); Hi All Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116 ? Very well done! G putting in a measly 19 rprts. I further away but putting in 26 rprts. Well done PA also in there with 24 rprts.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00049.html (9,634 bytes)
2. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: Peter <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:54:57 +0200; Hi, Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK receiving SAQ ? Peter PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00053.html (9,844 bytes)
3. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:30:47 +0100; Probably because it's so easy and we've done it many times before? G4AYT. -- Original Message -- From: "Peter" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00054.html (10,842 bytes)
4. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:47:51 +0100; And because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from that by now. Been there, done that Andy 咢4JNT On 13 July 2016 at 19:30, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: Probably because it's so easy; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00055.html (12,137 bytes)
5. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 09:37:08 +0000 (UTC); Hi all I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much higher than elsewhere. Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00056.html (11,556 bytes)
6. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:49:39 +0100; Pete re not getting your postings back from Blacksheep......have you checked in the Spam folder in your webmail?? Yahoo regards mail sent to self as spam !! Alan G3NYK Hi all I am still not getting m; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00057.html (12,134 bytes)
7. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:52:13 +0100; Most of your messages are ending up in my Spam box, in spite of me declaring each one as "Not Spam" It appears the GMail server checking (or whatever part of the Inet is doing it) is claiming your me; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00058.html (13,603 bytes)
8. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:42:23 +0000 (UTC); Hi Alan and Andy Many thanks for the info. It is gratifying that my mails are actually getting onto the Black Sheep server. Up until now they have all been rejected and bounced back to me. I use Yaho; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00059.html (13,511 bytes)
9. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: Richard S <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 13:02:29 +0200; Oh dear, the Brits feel left out of SAQ! 14 lip 2016 09:45 "M0FMT" <[email protected]> napisa(a): Hi all I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as perplexing as why the DL li; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00060.html (13,224 bytes)
10. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 14:17:00 +0100; 14 lip 2016 09:45 "M0FMT" <[email protected]> napisa(a): It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but don't report in.... a bit unlikely. Hi Pete Sorry, I was there, I watched the tune; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00061.html (12,573 bytes)
11. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:14:07 +0000 (UTC); Hi You can say that Richard but I couldn't possibly comment. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX . Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics To: [email protected] Date: Thursday, 14 July, 2016,; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00062.html (12,212 bytes)
12. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC); Hi Eddie There you are I was wrong there are lots of G stns listening but not reporting in. I can not speak on behalf of Lars but I bet he values every report. 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91U; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00063.html (11,528 bytes)
13. Re: LF: SAQ statistics (score: 1): Author: Peter <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 21:36:37 +0200; Hi, Anyone out there who can falsify the hypothesis that SAQ was active today (2016-07-14) around 1720 utc? Peter; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2016-07/msg00064.html (9,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]