Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: SAQ statistics

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
From: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 18:14:07 +0000 (UTC)
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1468520048; bh=yYGv50nSC1xi8XOLWMALVnJeBhMIBlzf8i1EmQWhP+4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=cJlv3Qil4uFogOJG3EnEP8QlR6mNI25dxP66hyrwMFjWtiqF66vlcq5c1NQGT0hkIgDicmH6po99LgHoai21lFOdMS4RZ96CgwHVc7O20+bioxA1db65huvPGJm1NrisfTfy6ffzRV/mcWMWzeZ9RJWOY55b72tjes9ZYEYNdYiPSn4eYZBgzCPrCgqzFIxXBKxfDAOv1ARTftb67/XLHs359S6+ou8E/sGu5ldjBAH9a1ATNyN3IEWm+hdHwN6DfT7w+uJeQrzj2BNnN+m3pUNYnqxBqppVrzy7dgde0Qr45uTqKOTfdyf8RAlkwoqPLklazrauC8Qc1Vpz9ilOfw==
References: <1034334070.5070379.1468520047061.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Hi

You can say that Richard but I couldn't possibly comment.

73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX 

.



--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 14/7/16, Richard S <[email protected]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
 To: [email protected]
 Date: Thursday, 14 July, 2016, 11:02
 
 Oh dear, the
 Brits feel left out of SAQ!
 14 lip 2016 09:45
 "M0FMT" <[email protected]>
 napisał(a):
 Hi all
 
 
 
 I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep
 almost as perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so
 much higher than elsewhere.
 
 
 
 Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to
 SM no doubt  contributes, but the difference is so large.
 It has been consistently large over many years.
 
 
 
 It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but
 don't report in.... a bit unlikely.
 
 
 
 Many thanks for the suggestions.
 
 
 
 Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic.
 
 
 
 73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in
 IO91UX
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --------------------------------------------
 
 On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
 wrote:
 
 
 
  Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
 
  To: [email protected]
 
  Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47
 
 
 
  And
 
  because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on
 from
 
  that by now.Been there, done that
 
  Andy  G4JNT
 
  On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,
 
  Chris <[email protected]>
 
  wrote:
 
  Probably
 
  because it's so easy and we've done it many
 times
 
  before?
 
 
 
  G4AYT.
 
 
 
  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter"
 <[email protected]>
 
 
 
  To: <[email protected]>
 
 
 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM
 
 
 
  Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Hi,
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
  ...
 
 
 
  Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at
 116
 
  ?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK
 
  receiving SAQ ?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Peter
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>