Hi
You can say that Richard but I couldn't possibly comment.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX
.
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 14/7/16, Richard S <[email protected]> wrote:
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 14 July, 2016, 11:02
Oh dear, the
Brits feel left out of SAQ!
14 lip 2016 09:45
"M0FMT" <[email protected]>
napisał(a):
Hi all
I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep
almost as perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so
much higher than elsewhere.
Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to
SM no doubt contributes, but the difference is so large.
It has been consistently large over many years.
It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but
don't report in.... a bit unlikely.
Many thanks for the suggestions.
Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in
IO91UX
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
wrote:
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47
And
because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on
from
that by now.Been there, done that
Andy G4JNT
On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,
Chris <[email protected]>
wrote:
Probably
because it's so easy and we've done it many
times
before?
G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
Hi,
On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:
...
Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at
116
?
Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK
receiving SAQ ?
Peter
PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav
|
