Re: LF: SAQ statistics

[Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>]

Most of your messages are ending up in my Spam box, in spite of me declaring each one as "Not Spam"

It appears the GMail server checking (or whatever part of the Inet is doing it) is claiming your messages do not appear to have an authenticated Yahoo address.

Andy  G4JNT

On 14 July 2016 at 10:37, M0FMT <m0fmt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Hi all

I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep almost as perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much higher than elsewhere.

Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to SM no doubt  contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been consistently large over many years.

It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but don't report in.... a bit unlikely.

Many thanks for the suggestions.

Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic.

73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX



--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
 Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47

 And
 because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from
 that by now.Been there, done that
 Andy  G4JNT
 On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,
 Chris <c.ashby435@btinternet.com>
 wrote:
 Probably
 because it's so easy and we've done it many times
 before?

 G4AYT.

 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" <pws@df3lp.de>

 To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>

 Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM

 Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics






 Hi,



 On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:


 ...

 Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at 116
 ?




 Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK
 receiving SAQ ?



 Peter



 PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav