Hi Alan and Andy
Many thanks for the info.
It is gratifying that my mails are actually getting onto the Black Sheep
server. Up until now they have all been rejected and bounced back to me.
I use Yahoo mail directly on the web (in the cloud) as a web page not as a Post
Box with desk top software.
Each of my specially setup and the fixed folders indicate if mail has been
received in them.
I direct all my mail unless from a contact listed sender to my trash folder
that empties automatically every two weeks or about 200mails which includes the
LF reflector. The philosophy being if its that important I will get a phone
call or a letter. However I do check my trash and spam regularly (well within
my two week limit) and not been caught out yet to my knowledge.
I have sent a mail to myself just now and it appeared in my In Box since my
address in in my contact list.
I am sure you are right its a quirk of either Yahoo or my "Too Way" Ka band
satellite Broad Band server connection. However its is only the Black Sheep
(BS) reflector that seems to give me grief.
I understand that BS is not being supported now and living on borrowed time so
to speak so I am not complaining just looking for observations that may help me
to help myself
Regards and many thanks.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 14/7/16, Alan Melia <[email protected]> wrote:
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, 14 July, 2016, 10:49
Pete re not getting your postings
back from Blacksheep......have you checked
in the Spam folder in your webmail?? Yahoo regards mail sent
to self as spam
!!
Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message -----
From: "M0FMT" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:37 AM
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
Hi all
I am still not getting my own mails back from Blacksheep
almost as
perplexing as why the DL listenership of SAQ is so much
higher than
elsewhere.
Population of Radio Amateurs and the proximity of DL land to
SM no doubt
contributes, but the difference is so large. It has been
consistently large
over many years.
It could be that the listenership in G land is higher but
don't report
in.... a bit unlikely.
Many thanks for the suggestions.
Oh apologies for highlighting such a boring topic.
73 es GL Pete M0FMT GQRP#15097.in IO91UX
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 13/7/16, Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
wrote:
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
To: [email protected]
Date: Wednesday, 13 July, 2016, 19:47
And
because it's chirpy CW and we've all moved on from
that by now.Been there, done that
Andy G4JNT
On 13 July 2016 at 19:30,
Chris <[email protected]>
wrote:
Probably
because it's so easy and we've done it many times
before?
G4AYT.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: LF: SAQ statistics
Hi,
On 13.07.2016 12:02, M0FMT wrote:
...
Why is there such a high number of DLs receiving SAQ at
116
?
Why is there such a low number of *reports* from UK
receiving SAQ ?
Peter
PS: http://lf-radio.de/misc/SAQ/SAQ_1998.wav
|
