Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Re\:\s+RE\:\s+Full\s+ID\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:33:23 +0100
I Suggested a timed beacon system, a long time ago , similar to the g3plx 5 meg monitoring system , where stations simply took an available time slot and transmitted a long pulse ... monitoring softw
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00050.html (14,791 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 21:23:41 +0100
SERVER 431--;;6D//;; TILLEY INVALID NON DELIVERY
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00105.html (10,015 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:11:57 +0100
We do not need Beacons on LF this is the problem also why do Appliance Operators on LF need to deviate from the procedures used on all the other amateur bands, who ever heard of single letter Beacons
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00192.html (15,367 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:12:07 +0000
Joe Taylor has come up with the tightest source coding of amateur callsigns as built into the WSPR and JT65  protocols.    By examining the make up of callsigns from letters numbers and spaces, with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00304.html (13,018 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:30:38 +0000
Gee Mal with all that SKILL I wonder why we haven't seen you here yet? The only QRM I see is the constant BS beacon from Scarborough on this reflector. Too bad you don't beacon your drivel on 2200m a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00435.html (29,348 bytes)

6. LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:21:50 +0100
Hi Rik, The idea is fine. But, the problems I have with this are (1) Stations don't always notify us who they are and what they are up to (Mike, G3XDV, is a perfect example of how it should be done,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg00707.html (13,820 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:31:06 +0100
I am not the only one that has expressed an opinion about a proper ID procedure on LF. Address your remarks to all concerned also stick to the subject, we are not discussing rubber stamp QSO'S. Have
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01009.html (19,026 bytes)

8. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: g4gvw <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:54:36 +0000
Mal, For many of us who, while licensed radio amateurs, are mainly interested in the behaviour of the spectrum and the medium via which signals are propagated, beacons at UHF, VHF, HF, MF, LF et. al.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01051.html (17,291 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Re: RE: Full ID (score: 1)
Author: "Jean-Pierre Méré (F1AFJ)" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:49:23 +0100
Hello Scott , Just a word : oui , oui ,oui ;-) ;-) ;-) 73 Jean-Pierre f1afj Le 24/12/2010 09:30, Scott Tilley a écrit : Gee Mal with all that SKILL I wonder why we haven't seen you here yet? The only
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-12/msg01073.html (29,686 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu