Easy one, this - because Mal uses it......... Paul G8GJA Why is WSPR (6Hz BW) supposedly unacceptable, yet 12wpm CW (about 50Hz BW) is OK? John F5VLF ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** On 27/08/2009 at 12:12 mal
The M0BMU LF/MF station is currently QRT due to a recent visit from relatives - all those pretty coloured wires and 3-year-olds don't really mix! It will probably be put back together this weekend t
mal hamilton wrote: Jim It is a pity you cannot stick to the subject, instead you launch a personal attack. For someone that has not progressed beyond basic entry level CW you are not in a position t
Dear Roger, LF Group, Please bear in mind that G3KEV does not speak for "us guys", only himself. Over the years we have learned to ignore him most of the time - if we took much notice, we would all h
Roger I have used just about every digital mode invented. I had a BBS for years GB7KEV main line East coast relay and delivery system. I had gateways vhf/uhf to HF and used PACKET, AMTOR, PACTOR and
If you look in the WSPR on-line database specifying the band as "LF/VLF", you will see that there has been quite a lot of WSPR activity over the last year on 136k and 500k, which has been one of the
Normally 25 to 30 wpm. 12 wpm is entry level, and data modes for those that cannot ENTER. On CW the essential information is exchanged quickly with speed adjustments on the hoof to overcome QSB where
Roger I know all about it and can decode it but I am not impressed. I can do better on CW and have worked some good DX to date especially X BAND. I tx on 500 and listen HF like 7 Mhz. mal/g3kev -- Or
Jim It is a pity you cannot stick to the subject, instead you launch a personal attack. For someone that has not progressed beyond basic entry level CW you are not in a position to compare the merits
Roger I know all about it and can decode it but I am not impressed. I can do better on CW and have worked some good DX to date especially X BAND. I tx on 500 and listen HF like 7 Mhz. mal/g3kev --
Who are the 'us guys' the majority of LF/MF operators are on CW, have a look at the list of operators that I sent yesterday. Jim you appear the odd time and your CW has got worse I expect its WSPR fo
Roger The majority of operators over the years prefer CW on LF and MF. These bands are narrow and we do not want the few Khz available cluttered up with data modes, especially Beacons. Those countrie
For someone that has not progressed beyond basic entry level CW you are not in a position to compare the merits of CW v other non morse modes. I guess that counts a an personal attack. I haven't noti
Roger The majority of operators over the years prefer CW on LF and MF. These bands are narrow and we do not want the few Khz available cluttered up with data modes, especially Beacons. Those countri
CW requires operator skill but machine generated data modes only needs an observer. Watch the kettle boil operator. Commercial operators use data modes to shift large amounts of information, hardly a
Hello Roger, for my knowledge there is no station frequently transmitting WSPR on 137KHz. There was some activity in January this year by DF6NM, M0BMU, F5WK, DF0WD, ... on dial frequency +/- 136.600K
Roger I am now QRV on 502.6 at 1840 local and QSX 3533 if u would like a QSO Mal/g3kev -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] Roger Lapthorn To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_gro
