To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency? |
From: | Peter Dodd <[email protected]> |
Date: | Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:11:08 +0100 |
In-reply-to: | <007e01ca2801$85412d80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
References: | <[email protected]> <005701ca2707$438a4570$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <009c01ca2731$2d5e0e60$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> <[email protected]> <847F3A04E31C413A81AD022BDC11AD46@JimPC> <007e01ca2801$85412d80$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) |
mal hamilton wrote: JimIt is a pity you cannot stick to the subject, instead you launch a personal attack. For someone that has not progressed beyond basic entry level CW you are not in a position to compare the merits of CW v other non morse modes.Who are 'us guys' Me for a start This is all a bit ripe coming from from the master of personal attacks! Peter, G3LDO An apology would not go amiss. mal/g3kev----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 9:18 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?Dear Roger, LF Group,Please bear in mind that G3KEV does not speak for "us guys", only himself. Over the years we have learned to ignore him most of the time - if we tookmuch notice, we would all have given up a long time ago.If you look in the WSPR on-line database specifying the band as "LF/VLF", you will see that there has been quite a lot of WSPR activity over the lastyear on 136k and 500k, which has been one of the more successful digital modes in this part of the spectrum. The points you make regarding narrowbandwidth and low power are certainly useful at LF/MF. The summer months are usually rather lacking in activity due to the short nights and high QRN, but activity, no doubt including WSPR, will be picking up soon as we get intoautumn. The M0BMU LF/MF station is currently QRT due to a recent visit from relatives - all those pretty coloured wires and 3-year-olds don't reallymix! It will probably be put back together this weekend though, so if youare interested in trying WSPR on 136k or 500k, let me know. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Lapthorn" <[email protected]>To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 7:33 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?...But it's *not* my place to tell you guys how to use the LF bands so withthis, I'll leave you to it and get back on 10m WSPR, CW and SSB. Good luck with whatever modes you enjoy. Roger 73s G3XBM--------------------------------------------------------------------------------No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.comVersion: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.69/2328 - Release Date: 08/26/09 12:16:00 |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: 184.508khz-184.510khz, Warren Ziegler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: LF: MF, Laurence BY3A-KL1X China |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?, mal hamilton |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: Re: 137kHz WSPR - what frequency?, Rik Strobbe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |