Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DK7FC\'s\s+2nd\s+VLF\s+TX\s+test\.\.\.\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:14:16 +0000
That is very nice. Herzlichen Glückwunsch an Stefan! This evening I will analyse the signal further - it is very faint and may not have much significance (statistically) but is nice to see and most
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00430.html (12,055 bytes)

22. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "rn3agc" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:02:36 +0300
Stefan, allow a silly question - the coil "sings"? 73 Andrey
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00461.html (12,002 bytes)

23. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:30:17 +0000
Stefan coming through on Markus' spectrogram:- http://www.mydarc.de/df6nm/vlf/vlfgrabber.htm -- Paul Nicholson --
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00499.html (11,299 bytes)

24. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:13:38 +0000
This is amazing stuff and congratulations to all concerned. When the tests are finished, please can we have a summary of the details here i.e. distances, power, antennas used etc? 73s Roger G3XBM On
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00523.html (14,423 bytes)

25. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:59:50 +0000 (GMT)
Paul, QRSS10 dots means 10 sec radiation then 10 sec pause. Then again 10 sec radiation and so on. I expect when signal was not broaded at the begining it was Stefan's tuning. After 16:30 as Markus m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00526.html (11,445 bytes)

26. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:43:40 +0000
Yes, the signal was too wide, except during the initial tuneup when the pure carrier sat nicely inside one frequency bin. I should think so. And still easy to read from the spectrogram. And gain mayb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00563.html (13,634 bytes)

27. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:20:10 +0000 (GMT)
(JMarkus, you got Stefan's sigs in QRSS10, not in QRSS100?? True? Wow! (B (JOn Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Markus Vester wrote: (B (J> (B (J> talked to Stefan on the cellphone about an hour ago. You can imagin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00576.html (11,801 bytes)

28. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:11:31 +0100
Dear Stefan, Paul, LF Group, I would agree that something like DFCW100 or DFCW200 with about 0.1Hz shift would be a good candidate mode for further DX tests. DFCW is about 2 -3 times quicker than QRS
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00584.html (15,794 bytes)

29. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:21:48 +0000 (GMT)
Such scepticist you are, Mal. Any data can be analysed. By the way frquency is some ID by itself. And certanly we are looking for more proof. Regards, Alexander
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00586.html (11,952 bytes)

30. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:38:11 -0400
Paul, Stefan's signal is clearly there on your spectrogram. WOW! A dream came true. Markus --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> An: [email protected] Vers
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00593.html (13,161 bytes)

31. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:57:53 +0100
It is important for ID that the TX was keyed otherwise it could be any carrier. Positive ID is needed otherwise the experiment is meaningless de G3KEV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00594.html (12,775 bytes)

32. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Paul Nicholson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:05:23 +0000
Stefan schrieb: I have already used every trick possible - the rx sensitivity at 9kHz is as good as it can be. I can think of no electronics or signal processing that will make further significant im
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00608.html (13,443 bytes)

33. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:30:43 +0000
If you go the the extent of UT synced FSK, then you'll gain another 3dB by using BPSK.   FSK is an orthogonal signalling mode, where you test the power level in one slot (frequency bin) against that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00616.html (14,822 bytes)

34. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:23:05 +0000 (GMT)
Wow! Regards, Alexander
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00632.html (10,768 bytes)

35. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:42:44 +0000
What distance is this? 73s Roger G3XBM On 15 March 2010 15:30, Paul Nicholson <[email protected]> wrote: Stefan coming through on Markus' spectrogram:-  http://www.mydarc.de/df6nm/vlf/vlfgrabber.ht
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00644.html (13,425 bytes)

36. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: Wolfgang Büscher <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:18:58 +0100
Well done, and congrats to everyone involved in the 8.97 kHz test ! The spectral spreading in Stefan's signal looks similar in Todmorden and Nuremberg, maybe the TX has been turned on and off with a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00655.html (12,738 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu