Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Bandplan\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 03:32:18 -0400
One practical remark : due to commercial QRM the band is useless for weaks signal reception below 136500 (at least here in Belgium). This would mean that in practice there is only 600Hz bandwidth fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00137.html (9,076 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "P. W. Schnoor" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 11:21:08 +0200
Hello Group, Pse hw? I don't think that we really need a bandplan. 54°16'N / 10°04'E, JO54ag 73 es gl de Peter, DF3LP
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00139.html (8,467 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Toni Bdrtschi" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 20:40:57 +0200
From HB9ASB/p, Saas Fee, JN36XC Hi friends, I'm just back from the Swiss Alpine LF meeting and we decided the following band plan for the rest of Europe (except for Switzerland since we are not in th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00143.html (8,822 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Rawlings" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 22:48:30 +0100
I don't think that we really need a bandplan. Without any operating guidelines, 136 kHz would soon become a very chaotic and frustrating band to operate. I believe that the adoption of a workable se
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00144.html (9,058 bytes)

5. LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:03:39 +0100
From Tom, G3OLB I agree with Alan's comments regarding the band-plan although I do think Toni was joking about an SSTV section Alan! Let's use the frequencies suggested by Geri and Rik as guidance on
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00146.html (8,336 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "P. W. Schnoor" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:22:38 +0200
Dear Colleagues, Without any operating guidelines, 136 kHz would soon become a very chaotic and frustrating band to operate. There's nothing what a "bandplan" could do against this. I do not fear cha
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00147.html (9,888 bytes)

7. Re: LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:02:29 EDT
<< > Of course, the current draft bandplan(s) still need further input and I hope not... I'm strictly against any further 'bandplaning'. It will generate more conflicts than fun! I think that when yo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00154.html (8,205 bytes)

8. LF: BANDPLAN (score: 1)
Author: "gii3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 13:17:03 +0000
I am surprised that no one has noticed that there is already a Bandplan in operation on 136 khz. All the QRS activity is centred around 135.920 khz and 137.650 khz plus or minus some hz. Other modes
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00389.html (7,738 bytes)

9. Re: LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:49:11 +0200
Hello Dick, Have a look at Geri's homepage : http://www.qru.de/bandplan.htm Just some minor differences with your proposal, but it seems best to me if we can get the "violins tuned" in all countries.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-06/msg00014.html (9,033 bytes)

10. LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Holger 'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 04:31:56 -0400
Hello Dick, as you might know, I have tried to include all my observations and discussions into my "unofficial bandplan" (see http://www.qru.de/bandplan.htm). Based on this, I suggest to change the t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-06/msg00015.html (8,324 bytes)

11. LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:17:45 +0200
To All from PA0SE Our national amateur radio society VERON every two years brings out a Vademecum (handbook, manual). I have been asked to write the chapter on LF. In the previous edition (year 2000)
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-06/msg00016.html (8,302 bytes)

12. LF: Bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 14:36:58 +0200
To All from PA0SE Many thanks to all who responded to my request (see below). I will use the suggestion by Geri, DK8KW, with a remark that it has not the status of an official bandplan but should be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-07/msg00252.html (8,691 bytes)

13. LF: bandplan (score: 1)
Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 18:28:58 +0100
The weekend was hectic with QRS acty all active around the same frequency of 137.7 Khz. Condx were excellent and signals from most very strong and I was able to see UA9OC as early as 1858 utc solid O
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2003-03/msg00195.html (9,361 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu