| To: | "LF-Group" <[email protected]> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | LF: Bandplan |
| From: | "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | Mon, 01 Jul 2002 14:36:58 +0200 |
| Reply-to: | [email protected] |
| Sender: | <[email protected]> |
|
To All from PA0SE Many thanks to all who responded to my request (see below). I will use the suggestion by Geri, DK8KW, with a remark that it has not the status of an official bandplan but should be regarded as a suggestion that has been accepted by most, but not all, users of the LF band. I will also add some remarks made by Mike, G3XDV, in a direct e-mail to me. 73, Dick, PA0SE Our national amateur radio society VERON every two years brings out a Vademecum (handbook, manual). I have been asked to write the chapter on LF. In the previous edition (year 2000) the chapter on LF included a bandplan: 135,7-136,0 kHz: local tests and temporary beacon transmissions 136,0-137,1 kHz: normal CW 137,5-137,6 kHz: non-CW modes (PSK31, RTTY, etc.) 137,7-137,8 kHz: slow CW (QRSS) Is it still considered valid or would it be better not to mention it? Or could you recommend a different text? Suggestions are welcome! 73, Dick, PA0SE |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | LF: LF Aerial cal article, Alan Melia |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | LF: LF Roundtable, Andy talbot |
| Previous by Thread: | LF: LF Aerial cal article, Alan Melia |
| Next by Thread: | LF: RE: Bandplan, John W Gould |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |