Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+472kHz\s+Band\s+QRSS\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:45:59 +0100
Am 05.01.2013 15:56, schrieb Graham: [...] qsb patterns preventing ultra long qrss decodes as noted years ago... Really? https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/DK7FC_QRSS-10_476_KHz_12-28-2012.jpg 73,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00136.html (10,261 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:13:37 +0000
Who started the trend to have QRSS in the middle of the 'new' band? There are two extremely strong signals there now as I write this. I would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00154.html (12,762 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:40:06 +0100
Hi Chris, Which kind of amateur radio activity did you plan to that time that became actually impossible due to the QRSS stations? Why were the QRSS stations a problem but the WSPR stations not? And
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00215.html (13,488 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:53:54 +0000
You'll have to wear sack cloth and ashes soon Pete :-) 73s and GL Roger G3XBM On 6 January 2013 11:21, M0FMT <[email protected]> wrote: OK Chris   I retract ...sorry again!.... 73 es GL Pete M0FMT IO
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00289.html (19,169 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:24:31 +0100
There are several issues here: (1) We have a very narrow band, which exhibits much stronger local and DX signals than the 136kHz band did. Therefore, there should be a combination of self discipline
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00297.html (12,995 bytes)

6. LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:05:36 +0100
Who started the trend to have QRSS in the middle of the 'new' band? There are two extremely strong signals there now as I write this. I would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00397.html (10,269 bytes)

7. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 19:24:22 +0100
Yes a good example of partial decode , and only once in the night , flash propagation is more likely on 500 , so mostly random letters are shown .. checking the wspr sync number gives a good indicati
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00596.html (11,583 bytes)

8. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:58:02 +0100
Chris There was a initial setting at the top of the band for wspr , along with other beacon and data modes , leaving the rest of the band clear and maximise the distance from live cw working etc howe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00673.html (12,424 bytes)

9. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: M0FMT <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 11:21:28 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Stefan, I agree with Mike, XDV, it makes more sense to have QRSS near the band edge, for the reasons stated. I cannot agree with your suggestion that QRSS would cause problems to 'normal' CW oper
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00678.html (18,418 bytes)

10. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 15:23:54 +0100
Hi Chris, IIRC the main objection was to have beacon-like QRSS transmissions at the *lower* end of the band because it was the largest section without strong NDBs. Instead of moving high-power QRSS t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00682.html (11,498 bytes)

11. Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 11:00:42 +0100
Hi Stefan, I agree with Mike, XDV, it makes more sense to have QRSS near the band edge, for the reasons stated. I cannot agree with your suggestion that QRSS would cause problems to 'normal' CW opera
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00754.html (16,138 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu