Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS

from [Roger Lapthorn] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS
From: Roger Lapthorn <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 15:13:37 +0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PTQ+MBNshBubBSju974u05aRi6w6flyNc7Wf9aZNVuM=; b=KyZsj/l7G3+WD0ZZAkhx0b8yAADYdX+U7UNwNEdfa4hWWKP8X0HspmfB5qheTxkIvY PR3v7fW9oUwtVJsxuwZbwin+QYvWaRiK3CFjWqHZ652m9euNw8SZZYv5PzkK7RQl6gts FRFOpy87lD4z79D46+trZeV4swkVfnivUqDJHyMmj/3GoIY9WukkkUMMR6qtrP3mSc9s dN6RaPFZ4ndNoFiEx0MOpbKtelPuuLFApS9710gp3IV3EEfMYXJi6h6//hEJuYQrzCPT gPf/61wKB01V9MIBk/fJiz1ZUVcVYPBdsnJs4FZjLthP4ylOv+ZhxMZY/ZyfmMkU3896 C8FQ==
In-reply-to: <28CB8EF648E7418BB5C2D4802F72C23C@IBM7FFA209F07C>
References: <28CB8EF648E7418BB5C2D4802F72C23C@IBM7FFA209F07C>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Just tell me where to operate CW, QRSS, WSPR and JT9 etc and I will willingly follow any gentleman's agreement or more formal plan.

Personally I think a "light touch" outline bandplan IS now needed. No rules, just a sensible way of organising that will maximise everyone's enjoyment of their chosen modes with minimal interference to other amateurs and to NDBs. People do not have to rigidly follow it, but it would benefit all if we did.

73s
Roger G3XBM


On 5 January 2013 14:04, Chris <[email protected]> wrote:
Who started the trend to have QRSS in the middle of the 'new' band? There are two extremely strong signals there now as I write this. I would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers would be better suited to near the band edges.
Three German operators suggested a band plan during late September, in which QRSS was near the bottom of the band. As far as I remember this plan was met with some hostility.
It has been suggested that people will not stick to a band plan. I find this hard to believe, particularly in respect of QRSS, if they want their signals to be found.
Another problem I would suggest, is just how many know how to measure/calculate their EIRP? I have noticed several contributors to this reflector refer to ERP.
Food for thought?
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT.



--
 http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/
http://qss2.blogspot.com/

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS, Graham
Next by Date:  Re: LF: G3ZJO - DK7FC, Stefan Schäfer
Previous by Thread:  Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS, Graham
Next by Thread:  Re: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS, Mike Dennison
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]