Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: 472kHz Band QRSS

To: "RSGB LF Group" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: 472kHz Band QRSS
From: "Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2013 14:04:13 -0000
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1357394650; bh=0I1M0czUL5cH5RcEbKN215XgZvxz3S8q+TZOeAiQMlM=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=GMtU9f/peZOrvA+V9ITsVO9q5H2vLiZtYrMPAGzY6N+z9fO+RXytXqS7Uyt/PdfvCKdahSunapIs6JxAUoKBbJE44sizoN+tzQg92ZURTczvYUCcN6Fv2Id6xfQc0XheVOc4Z1i2kQeHeKv3rgRA4ay69s0B1lN2hrI3HvZzqis=
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Who started the trend to have QRSS in the middle of the 'new' band? There are two extremely strong signals there now as I write this. I would have thought any mode that requires long plain carriers would be better suited to near the band edges.
Three German operators suggested a band plan during late September, in which QRSS was near the bottom of the band. As far as I remember this plan was met with some hostility.
It has been suggested that people will not stick to a band plan. I find this hard to believe, particularly in respect of QRSS, if they want their signals to be found.
Another problem I would suggest, is just how many know how to measure/calculate their EIRP? I have noticed several contributors to this reflector refer to ERP.
Food for thought?
Vy 73,
Chris, G4AYT.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>