Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 273 ]

Total 273 documents matching your query.

121. LF: Re: SV8CS (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 17:08:47 +0000
&#8203;-23dB here, I will switch on the PA 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens SV8CS-Spiros Chimarios <[email protected]> Verzonden:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00047.html (10,928 bytes)

122. Re: LF: Re: SV8CS (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 17:31:52 +0000
Hi Spiros, I called you for the past 15 minutes, but no luck. Have to go QRT for dinner now, maybe later this evening? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T PS your signal here: 1654 -26 0.1 1101 1 CQ SV8CS KM07 1702
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00049.html (13,657 bytes)

123. LF: Re: SV8CS (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 17:53:51 +0000
Here QRN is also much higher than the past days, but still solid copy. CU later. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens SV8CS-Spiros
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00051.html (15,486 bytes)

124. LF: Re: Oscar LU1DOW - Amazing results in MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 08:12:22 +0000
Hi Luis, all, TA propagation was no so good (compared to the previous nights), but toward southern directions it seemed much better. Related to the increased K-index? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00071.html (10,864 bytes)

125. LF: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:29:33 +0000
Dear all, a few months ago there was a short discussion about a "revival" of the slower JT9 modes such as JT9-2 and JT9-5. These modes existed in early versions of WSJT-X, and had the advantage of a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00110.html (11,274 bytes)

126. LF: Re: AW: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:58:05 +0000
Oops, a typo in the filename. I renamed it on the server, the link should work now. My applologies! 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00113.html (17,892 bytes)

127. Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 22:12:22 +0000
Hi Paul, About JT9 coding: for this I am using another exe file of the WSJT-X suite. It seems to work fine, both for free and structured messages. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Hello Rik, I am very interested
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00115.html (15,635 bytes)

128. LF: Re: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:25:25 +0000
Dear all, the first bug is discovered ;-) I deliberately limited the maximum audio frequency to 1400Hz (as it is not a good idea to use JT9 in the WSPR band), and this is send as a parameter to the d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00120.html (13,858 bytes)

129. LF: Re: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:53:48 +0000
I just uploaded version 0.9.01, the maximum frequency bug for JT9-2 and JT9-5 should be cured: http://472khz.org/SlowJT9/SlowJT9_setup.exe&#8203; 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksh
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00123.html (15,050 bytes)

130. LF: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application: shown S/N values (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 18:46:07 +0000
Dear all, just a short notice that the shown S/N values are those delivered by the JT9 decoder, not taking the audio conversion into account. This means that the real S/N values are about 3dB lower (
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00130.html (10,987 bytes)

131. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 20:36:22 +0000
Audible here as well with the RX in CW mode. Nil in AM mode. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens Markus Vester <[email protected]
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00138.html (13,281 bytes)

132. LF: Re: AW: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application: shown S/N values (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:14:06 +0000
Bundesnetzagentur Hello Marco, I had SlowJT9 running in JT9-2 mode and copied you, but had left the shack for some minutes: 2055 -11 0.0 1106 2 CQ DD7PC JN49 I called you when I came back, but you pr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00142.html (17,600 bytes)

133. LF: Re: AW: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application: shown S/N values (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:26:23 +0000
Bundesnetzagentur Hello Marco, all, I will leave SlowJT9 in JT9-2 mode running (RX) overnight. I will be in and out the shack till 23 UTC and will reply to any call I can catch. If there are any over
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00143.html (18,626 bytes)

134. LF: Re: AW: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application: shown S/N values (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:29:33 +0000
Bundesnetzagentur &#8203;In addition to my previous mail: I have rather high QRM levels below 800Hz audio (at 474.2kHz dial USB). Best is between 900Hz and 1200Hz audio. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T Van: Rik
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00144.html (19,282 bytes)

135. LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 22:21:49 +0000
Dear all, I just completed a JT9-2 QSO with Marco, DD7PC: 2141 -11 0.1 1104 2 OR7T DD7PC JN49 2145 -10 0.1 1106 2 OR7T DD7PC JN49 2153 -16 0.0 1105 2 OR7T DD7PC R-13 2157 -12 0.0 1105 2 OR7T DD7PC 73
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00145.html (12,815 bytes)

136. Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 14:36:06 +0000
Hello Paul, I cannot find the WSPR15 specs right away, but I assume that is is just a "stretched" version of WSPR(2). In that case it would be 4-FSK at 0.195 Bd and a tone spacing of 0.195 Hz (0.8 Hz
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00151.html (25,806 bytes)

137. Re: LF: 1476 kHz AM (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:37:44 +0000
&#8203;&#8203;Hello Markus, FSKing the carrier a few Hz would be easy to implement and easy to detect. One option would be DFCW another would be WSPR. For both you would need no more than arduino boa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00158.html (12,230 bytes)

138. Re: LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 16:55:22 +0000
Hello Markus, For 1: extending the audio frequency range is possible, limitation is the fmax of 5kHz of the JT9 decoder. As a result the maximum audio frequency is 2.5kHz for JT9-2 and 1kHz for JT9-5
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00160.html (15,035 bytes)

139. Re: LF: SlowJT9: 1st QSO and 2nd bug found (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:01:41 +0000
The past month there is JT9 and FT8 activity almost every day on 630 m, but most of the time the same 4 ot 5 stations. But having a look at John's (KB5NJD) daily reports (http://njdtechnologies.net/c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00168.html (11,193 bytes)

140. Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: JT9-2 and JT9-5 mode application (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 19:26:12 +0000
Hi Paul, all, "I don't know if it is possible to run two instances of SlowJT9 with different settings?" Your question triggered an idea: it should be possible (and even not very difficult) to decode
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00169.html (18,498 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu