Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 240 ]

Total 240 documents matching your query.

141. Re: LF: UNID on 500 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 14:54:31 +0100
Copying it 57 here in Bracknell Gary IO91PJ. Seems to have some sort of warble on it but no obvious data. 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergeant.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00218.html (9,301 bytes)

142. Re: LF: 500 RX (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 21:25:30 +0100
Another UC/1 user here Mal, although I use its 28MHz output into my K2. That shows up one of its weaknesses, in that the 116MHz downconverter crystal is not too stable and is hard to get spot on so I
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00263.html (9,350 bytes)

143. Re: LF: 500.3kcs 2100 bst - G3UNT (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 06:44:31 +0100
I hope that frequency was an typo in the subject line ...... By the way do others get a weakish data transmission on 503.6kHz or is it a receiver sproggy here?? I had problems copying 'UNT under it t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00308.html (9,258 bytes)

144. Re: LF: RE: Re: [500] G3WCB QRV 503.350 kHz...DFCW3... (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:39:03 +0100
And thanks for the frequency check (on my at present uncalibrated receiver). 599 here in Bracknell IO91PJ on my untuned longwire. The readout says 503.300 so not that far out... Job for the weekend i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00312.html (10,223 bytes)

145. LF: PA2NL (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:41:26 +0100
PA2NL is currently beaconing in QRSS on 502.45. Does anybody know about this station? I thought it was somebody doing tx tuning tests but then heard Mal 'KEV and Colin G3VTT discussing it. No normal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00343.html (8,074 bytes)

146. Re: LF: Front panel lettering ? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:04:52 +0100
Well I shall be using a black marker pen, like I did on my 5MHz TX. Never was an artist... Slowly getting there at G3YMC. TX is now putting a good 8W from a MRF315 into a dummy load, fed by a G0MRF L
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00348.html (10,809 bytes)

147. LF: (Fwd) [ukfivemegs] RAC - Canadian 135 kHz and 5 MHz Special Au (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 10:22:42 +0100
I have just received this on the 5MHz reflector. Perhaps some of our VE friends can comment. 73 Dave G3YMC RAC - Canadian 135 kHz and 5 MHz Special Authorizations Terminated Special Authorizations fo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00003.html (10,390 bytes)

148. Re: LF: Re: Re: QRSS on 500 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 06:38:22 +0100
This needs qualifying. Yes, I gather there are some people using QRSS on these bands. They specifically use microwatt type power levels so the casual listener doesn't hear them at all, and they are c
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00007.html (10,454 bytes)

149. Re: LF: Field Strength Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 21:27:30 +0100
I think I am safe with my 3mW erp.... at least it reaches Biggleswade. Incidentally after we worked yesterday Dave G3WCB sent me a wav recording of the QSO and an Argo screen shot. Our signals sounde
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00012.html (9,965 bytes)

150. Re: LF: [500] Re: G3XAQ on 502.0 KHz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 06:54:33 +0100
Not surprised.... but welcome to 500kHz. You are a good signal (579- 589) here in Bracknell. I seem to be having some difficulties with both the antenna (a 10m base loaded vertical with no top loadin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00070.html (11,479 bytes)

151. Re: LF: Re: Three men in a boat (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:25:37 +0100
I would tend to agree with Mal. Now we have quite a few of us here in the UK on the band it is fairly obvious that we can copy and work each other within G land without using QRSS. The longer station
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00174.html (11,081 bytes)

152. Re: LF: test on 503.6 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 17:37:38 +0100
Full VXO control over the whole band (and a little more...) so I try and always call co-channel - so I was bang on your frequency (which may have been Brian's...). 73 Dave G3YMC http://www.davesergea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00189.html (9,179 bytes)

153. Re: LF: test on 503.6 (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 16:53:50 +0100
Wondered why it was quiet.... (you would never ever get me watching things like that, put off for life kicking a ball around at school...). I did call you this morning Dave after you had finished wit
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00190.html (8,883 bytes)

154. Re: LF: Rugby - Anthorn (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:04:36 +0100
Althorn is definitely a lot down in strength here in IO91PJ compared with Rugby, and I know they had predicted this would be the case as it is significantly further away. But if it is that far down i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00207.html (10,840 bytes)

155. Re: LF: [ 500] G3YMC - Report (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:34:09 +0100
Many thanks Dave! Still not got the matching sorted out as the SWR is pretty lousy but think the coil is now on resonance. Called G3KEV and G3XIZ earlier with no results so was getting disheartened..
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00236.html (11,249 bytes)

156. Re: LF: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 13:33:16 +0100
Interesting comments... I agree that specifying power in terms of ERP is not really that suitable for amateur operation and a licence specified as power output, as per all the usual amateur bands, is
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00249.html (11,060 bytes)

157. Re: LF: 502 Khz (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 07:01:31 +0100
Sorry Colin, last night I was down at the Basinstoke club giving a talk on QRP and the K2, a very enjoyable evening. I even showed off the new 500k TX!! (some of them didn't even know we had a band d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00310.html (9,057 bytes)

158. Re: LF: 500 propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 13:16:57 +0100
Guess that explains why the HF bands are so dire this morning.... All I hear on 500kHz at the moment is noise... There is no indication of this event on the DK0WCY magnetometer, it says 'quiet', 'qui
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00366.html (9,696 bytes)

159. Re: LF: 500 kHz loop antenna ? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:10:05 +0100
Interesting thought Rik. When I finally get my 10m vertical resonated I will see how that performs and if it fails I have two choices - my 110ft low long wire (terrible on 160m) or put my 136kHz loop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00374.html (11,724 bytes)

160. Re: LF: 500kHz Distance (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 18:55:32 +0100
I am not quite sure what you are saying Laurie. I gather you are using lots of top load to your antenna which results in the radiation resistance increasing to a more realistic level than the 1 ohm o
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-05/msg00377.html (11,416 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu