Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 611 ]

Total 611 documents matching your query.

1. RE: LF: SAQ reports (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:21:32 +0200
...Referred to the bin width of your "IF"-window which is about 7.6Hz. Excellent SNR anyway! 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-07/msg00001.html (9,218 bytes)

2. RE: Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:21:32 +0200
That fits quite nicely with the waterfall diagram on my Perseus,see att. SNR was around 18dB in a 80Hz BW. = sent from my gpo creed 7b teleprinter + + 73 Clemens DL4RAJ Attachment: SAQ_2014_07_02_14
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-07/msg00002.html (11,101 bytes)

3. LF: RE: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:03:44 +0200
Hello André, I believe S/N reports are realistic in any BW if you are telling the BW at which the SNR has been measured. Unfortunately in many S/N reports the associated BW is missing. and therefore
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00046.html (14,105 bytes)

4. RE: LF: RE: Re: Testing now a new RX antenna on MF (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 23:48:58 +0200
Hi Roeloff, while 0dB SNR referenced to the RX BW is commonly defined as the "minimum discernible signal" I agree with you that with the listening skills of an experienced operator and low cw speed 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00049.html (13,442 bytes)

5. RE: LF: MF activity from Uto lighthouse next weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 21:37:07 +0200
I can copy OH1AH in the beacon mode at the moment (vvv de...): RST 3-459 Distance ca. 1377km Ant.2x155m Dipol; RX Perseus http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN68KJ79WJ 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00094.html (14,085 bytes)

6. LF: RE: OH1AH/LH (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 18:34:26 +0200
Mal, Did you hear me,too? 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00100.html (8,663 bytes)

7. RE: LF: RE: OH1AH/LH (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:37:54 +0200
Tnx Christian. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00102.html (9,617 bytes)

8. LF: RE: ros beacon 476 K (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:00:36 +0200
Hi G., I see and hear a S9+8dB carrier on 475.477 with slight slow audible frequency variation. Is this you? I don't have ROS installed yet. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00167.html (9,653 bytes)

9. RE: LF: RE: ros beacon 476 K (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:15:06 +0200
Tnx Graham, now I really saw and heard your sig on 475.7 S9+10dB. I can't download ros yet until approvement after having joined the group. Could you email me the zip file (PM)? 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00170.html (11,432 bytes)

10. RE: LF: RE: ros beacon 476 K (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 21:35:52 +0200
OK,thanks,will try this version. Forget my tentative report (S9+10) in my last mail, I was fooled by DJ0ABR's WSPR signal,he's 47km away... Forgot that WSPR signals are also around this frequency. 73
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-08/msg00172.html (13,609 bytes)

11. RE: LF: T/A on 472kHz WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:24:57 +0200
By comparison to other signals on different remote perseus receivers all over europe incl. iceland my educated guess is 10W ERP... 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-09/msg00126.html (11,330 bytes)

12. RE: LF: T/A on 472kHz WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 20:51:16 +0200
I have absolutely no problem with stations running 10W ERP in CW on MW as long as their signal is CLEAN. The stronger the signal the more important is cleanness. And Stefan,no hard feelings,just cou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-09/msg00136.html (12,776 bytes)

13. LF: RE: JA7NI - grabber (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2014 18:55:21 +0200
Same here. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-10/msg00065.html (19,458 bytes)

14. LF: RE: XPQ CW 475.00 (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 15:01:45 +0100
Hi Laurence, could you give us the start and stop time of your transmission in UTC and with date? 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-10/msg00357.html (9,013 bytes)

15. LF: RE: MF CW activity (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 16:56:31 +0100
I've come across a report of a special international meeting of professional CW operators at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7ppu4Qsw54 The reporter speaks German but the discussion among the attende
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-11/msg00033.html (12,243 bytes)

16. LF: TA 630M WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:25:59 +0100
Interesting decodes by DH5RAE this early evening. I guess these are probably not real... 2014-11-30 17:22 K5XL 0.475752 -20 -1 EM12kp 2 DH5RAE JN68qv 8643 39 2014-11-30 17:20 KD6RF 0.475722 -20 1 EM2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-11/msg00349.html (9,161 bytes)

17. RE: LF: TA 630M WSPR (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 23:02:54 +0100
Bingo! A quick cross check revealed they had all been WSPRing on 20m at that time and been spotted by DH5RAE but with the wrong band indication. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-11/msg00353.html (9,621 bytes)

18. LF: RE: F4DTL QRSS3 beacon tonight 475,573 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 12:37:37 +0100
Hello Nicolas, solid copies in QRSS3 and fair copy in CW, see attachments. 765km over land path. Ant.2x155m Dipol; RX Perseus http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=JN68KJ79WJ 73 Clemens DL4RAJ Attachment
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-12/msg00012.html (10,093 bytes)

19. LF: RE: RE: F4DTL QRSS3 beacon tonight 475,573 kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:07:55 +0100
Addendum: Just have been looking through my perseus recordings. Best signal was from 2300z to around 0200z but QRSS3 copy was basically possible from start to end of transmission although there were
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-12/msg00014.html (10,770 bytes)

20. RE: div. LW BC qrt / was RE: LF: DLF 153 kHz QRT (score: 1)
Author: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 15:48:46 +0100
DLF 207 kHz had been off for service for some days a few weeks ago. I was indeed able to hear Iceland in the evening with my K9AY at that time in southern Germany (lower Bavaria). P.S. In my new BMW
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2014-12/msg00178.html (10,482 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu