Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT
From: "Clemens Paul" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 22:21:32 +0200
In-reply-to: <trinity-67f0dd69-cb71-4677-acbe-c2bc613c2e02-1404329750792@3capp-gmx-bs12>
References: <001101cf9605$643c25a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <trinity-df24d106-3acc-45d5-9cb3-3cc59a6aaee0-1404319405443@3capp-gmx-bs23>, <008d01cf961d$97a11cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> <trinity-67f0dd69-cb71-4677-acbe-c2bc613c2e02-1404329750792@3capp-gmx-bs12>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: Ac+WLRePmd499k1fTxW3Lw8Trs6/5gAzDerg
 >Plotted a (raw!) histogram. Compared to MSF and 
>DCF77 I found a maximum of field strengths around 
>~18 Hz below 17.2 kc/s.

That fits quite nicely with the waterfall diagram on my Perseus,see att.
SNR was around 18dB in a 80Hz BW.

= sent from my gpo creed 7b teleprinter + +
73
Clemens
DL4RAJ 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] 
>[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LZ
>Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 9:36 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Aw: Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT
>
>Hi Jay,
>
>You wrote:
>> During key down, as the frequency went lower, the signal 
>strength seemed to increase 
>> slightly. 
>
>Plotted a (raw!) histogram. Compared to MSF and 
>DCF77 I found a maximum of field strengths around 
>~18 Hz below 17.2 kc/s.
>
>Laura
>
>Sent from my BayesPhone
>

Attachment: SAQ_2014_07_02_14.30z.jpg
Description: JPEG image

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>