To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Aw: Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT |
From: | LZ <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 2 Jul 2014 21:35:50 +0200 |
Authentication-results: | mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: [email protected] does not designate permitted sender hosts) smtp.mail=[email protected] |
Delivered-to: | [email protected] |
Importance: | normal |
In-reply-to: | <008d01cf961d$97a11cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> |
References: | <001101cf9605$643c25a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <trinity-df24d106-3acc-45d5-9cb3-3cc59a6aaee0-1404319405443@3capp-gmx-bs23>, <008d01cf961d$97a11cd0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Sensitivity: | Normal |
Hi Jay, You wrote: > During key down, as the frequency went lower, the signal strength seemed to > increase > slightly. Plotted a (raw!) histogram. Compared to MSF and DCF77 I found a maximum of field strengths around ~18 Hz below 17.2 kc/s. Laura Sent from my BayesPhone |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT, jrusgrove |
---|---|
Next by Date: | LF: Beaconing on 476.500 kHz, F1AFJ |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: SAQ 'extra transmission' in CT, jrusgrove |
Next by Thread: | LF: Beaconing on 476.500 kHz, F1AFJ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |