Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 144 ]

Total 144 documents matching your query.

101. LF: Re: Test on 136.17x (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:19:36 +0100
I've just seen, about ten minutes ago, a single solitary QRSS30 dot on about 137.707± 1Hz or so, John. Could this have been you, I wonder? Martin GW3UCJ Swansea. Can't do it tonight. Problem with ant
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00683.html (8,601 bytes)

102. LF: 137kHz tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:34:30 +0100
G3KEV, DK7FC, G3XDV and possibly someone else, weaker, in the middle: GW3UCJ IO81CR Attachment: 137_18th.JPG Description: JPEG image
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00476.html (7,968 bytes)

103. LF: Conditions seem good tonight on 136. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:52:12 +0100
Two very strong signals on 136.172 or thereabouts - not been on long enough to record callsigns yet, but they are so strong that I can hear a 2Hz beat between the two! Martin GW3UCJ IO81CR Swansea, S
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00756.html (7,895 bytes)

104. LF: 137kHz tonight. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 22:01:52 +0100
The band is full of signals tonight - Who is on 137.350 or thereabouts? Lovely strong signal but the CW doesn't seem to make sense - unless it's me. Martin GE3UCJ Swansea IO81CR
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00031.html (7,665 bytes)

105. LF: Tuning inductance for 137kHz receive. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:45:47 +0100
I use a decade inductance bridge to series tune my (approximately) 50m end-fed inverted U wire for 137kHz. It uses 3mH - 2mH is too little, 4mH is too much. Obviously I need to be able to vary this i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00234.html (9,808 bytes)

106. Re: LF: Tuning inductance for 137kHz receive. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:27:24 +0100
Brings back memories, Andy - I used to buy old valve radios from junk shops in the late 50s, early 60s for 2 shillings and sixpence each....if I'd kept them all intact, I could be living in the Baham
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00339.html (11,143 bytes)

107. Re: LF: Tuning inductance for 137kHz receive. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:24:51 +0100
Yes - I was given this tip by someone else yesterday, Kevin ( my apologies to the original tipster - I'm in another location now, and can't recall who it was!). As you say, the problem is to find suc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00369.html (11,215 bytes)

108. Re: LF: Tuning inductance for 137kHz receive. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:47:46 +0100
Oh Wolf, please! - you'll have me fantasizing again! Martin GW3UCJ. build a really big former from the "brickwork" used for Renato's monster VLF induction coil ? From http://www.vlf.it/romero3/ics101
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00658.html (10,666 bytes)

109. Re: LF: Tuning inductance for 137kHz receive. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:03:47 +0100
Morning, Pete. Thanks for this. Yes, this is what I should do. My problem is that I get carried away - I begin by thinking of making a variometer - then I decide that it *must* be the biggest one eve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00671.html (11,399 bytes)

110. LF: signal on 137.500kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:26:35 +0100
I can see a carrier on 137.500 or thereabouts, good and strong, a repeated transmission. It just looks like a wobbly carrier - or is it a transmission mode that I'm failing to recognise? Martin GW3UC
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg01000.html (8,632 bytes)

111. Re: LF: Tuning inductance for 137kHz receive. (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 22:42:09 +0100
Thanks Stefan - this is what I feared. Guess that I'll have to be more conventional! I did look for you earlier this evening, but couldn't see your signal. I hope your new FETs arrive tomorrow. Marti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg01009.html (10,503 bytes)

112. Re: LF: signal on 137.500kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:34:14 +0100
Thanks Jim.. I tried to decode it as WSPR without luck. Nothing new in that for me, though! Anyway, he's a nice strong signal so let's have another go..... Martin GW3UCJ The "wobbly carrier" signal i
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg01084.html (9,730 bytes)

113. Re: LF: signal on 137.500kHz (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:30:21 +0100
No, it's not Andy, Albert - he is about 50Hz lower in frequency, and decoding very nicely with me. Whoever it is on 137.500, he's still sending - about one period on, two periods off ( I haven't got
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg01087.html (9,272 bytes)

114. LF: Re: Op decode GW3UCB-WK3BO (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:23:57 +0100
That was me, I think, Terry - GW3UCJ in Swansea. Not a real one, I'm sure. Would have been nice if it had been! As it is, I'm still trying to decode any Russians. Blame the mountains! Martin. ~~~~~~~
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-02/msg00246.html (9,149 bytes)

115. LF: Re: Flex 3000 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:09:27 +0100
Mal - can't recall the details, but USB-firewire adapters don't work with the Flex - or at least, most of them. There's been plenty of discussion about this on the [email protected] group. I'
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00418.html (8,838 bytes)

116. Re: LF: IEEE488 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 20:40:38 +0100
Thanks for this, Gary - yes, I've given up the idea of using the IEEE488 interface - external switching it will be. Still looking for that book, incidentally - I haven't forgotten. Martin GW3UCJ. ~~~
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00124.html (10,192 bytes)

117. Re: LF: IEEE488 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 19:47:45 +0100
Well, what you're saying could sound simple to you, Graham, but a nice keyed relay sounds a lot simpler to a Silver Surfer brought up on 6V6s and 807s! Martin GW3UCJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It may be p
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00153.html (10,844 bytes)

118. Re: LF: An "LF-reflector" Yahoo group instead .....PLEASE (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 15:31:42 +0100
I moderate one Yahoo group, and am a member of at least another dozen, and fully agree with those proposing an LF Yahoo group, with all the facilities available. In ten years, there have been very ve
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00196.html (10,862 bytes)

119. Re: LF: IEEE488 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 20:36:37 +0100
I'll use transistor switching really, Graham - the relay is metaphorical... I can just about manage that...solid state 12AX7, no problem! Martin GW3UCJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Well that's the problem, we al
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00218.html (10,203 bytes)

120. LF: IEEE488 (score: 1)
Author: "Martin Evans" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 17:11:41 +0100
I've got a R&S APN62 sig genny, 1Hz to 260Hz synthesised, which I'm thinking of using as a signal source for a 137kHz TX. I would like to key this from a QRSS program on a computer. The only control
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-05/msg00233.html (9,135 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu