To: | <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: IEEE488 |
From: | "Martin Evans" <[email protected]> |
Date: | Sat, 12 May 2012 20:36:37 +0100 |
References: | <A318522BCED445EAB5653B1E0996A0EB@computereebf79> <96F6DE3827714341B45E5194EA6D7946@AGB> <933D952DE28E4835A61D2B4B6F455CBF@computereebf79> <B024050ECD814C5AA6F0F4AB8A21CAE0@AGB> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
I'll use transistor switching really, Graham - the relay is metaphorical... I can just about manage that...solid state 12AX7, no problem! Martin GW3UCJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Well that's the problem, we all know what the kit can do , but there are only a few who can tap the keys and make it perform ..I think your keying relay would be OK for OP8 .as long as the pull in and release times are well matched to retain the envelope shape ..I think pulse 'jitter' would be a problem on the higher (shorter) versions ...... could you not use blocking keying or a pin diode switch ? |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: LF: Re: Demonstrating audibility of weak signals - utilty to play with., Andy Talbot |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: IEEE488, Martin Evans |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: IEEE488, Graham |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: IEEE488, Graham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |