I've also noticed the trend, my renewal came up a couple of weeks ago and i agonised as to whether it was still worth having. I decided to continue ONLY to support the RSGB for what it does for us in
Thinking of improving my ability to inprove s/n to be able to display QRSS signals using argo, spectrum lab, and decode rtty, psk, cw etc. Current system for this purpose AMD K6 processor with Win95
Saw this and thought it was amusing in the light of recent postings. Yahoo mail group dedicated to CW without CW skills ! Check it at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CW_Blasphemy/ The group focuses on
A big thankyou to everyone who replied to my recent e-mails on energy saving bulbs. I sent the message to 3 different lists and received 31 replies. The general conclusion seems to be that the only i
For many years I have avoided using the energy saving bulbs under the impression that they were major RF pollutents. I am under increasing pressure to move to using these bulbs. Are my concerns still
Is anyone planning to WSPR on 136 -137 kHz at anytime from now until Sunday evening. some advance info would be helpful If so can you let me know the days and rough timings. I have been experimenting
I usually go to the wspr database on line and see what frequencies are being reported by others for the station I have heard. Then I average the reports and adjust my RX until it gives the average fi
I have always been interested in propagation. These WSPR signals are seen by some as repetitious rubbish. If you use , WSPR, the Internet database and your own receptions you soon realise that there
a more fundamental question. at the bottom of the WSPR screen a red box has Rx Noise then a -dB number. What order of dBs do you normally see in here. regards peter == Dear Graham, LF Group, The SNR
hi Jim, have not put your spots on the database as am seeing 3 signals from you in somerset 1346 -8 -1.6 0.136909 0 M0BMU IO91 23 1346 -24 -1.6 0.137009 0 M0BMU IO91 23 1346 -26 -1.6 0.137042 0 M0BMU
Thanks Jim for this observation and others for their feedback. When I first set up WSPR, in the days when the s/n button did not exist I ran a series of tests where I changed the level into the sound
In addition to what James has said. Use of the WSPR site more fully can eliminate a lot of the uncertainties being discussed If more stations use the WSPR website/database for reporting then more con
Now back to 500kHz WSPRing.... 73s Roger G3XBM 2009/10/31 Alan Melia <[email protected]> Hi Roger you will find that the late Reg Edwards programs GRNDWAV3 (I think) gives a very good idea of
I suggest you go to Google and put "Alberto di Bene" in the search criteria before you critise and beleive that failure to have a qso with you is a failure to contribute to LF/MF regards peter G8AF
Is anyone planning any propagation experiments on136kHz or thereabouts during the eclipse next week. I have not yet decided whether to study it, visually or by radio techniques. Also if I stay at hom
Thanks to everyone who commented on "Is anyone planning any propagation experiments on136kHz or there abouts during the eclipse next week". After your comments I decided to study it, visually and by
this shower is due to peak in the early hours of 18 November. Although an annual shower, this year is the one that is expected to give a massive display, once every 33 years of maybe thousands of met
Steve, slightly earlier in the evening I heard wideband noise across the LF band. I can best describe it as like bacon and eggs frying in a pan. I have now heard this 3 times in the last year and eac
Never previously considered listening to 73kHz due to the interference. Will probably take a half day off work tomorrow and see what is happening. who will be txing on which modes and what frequencie
Listened and viewed all morning. Nothing heard, A few very weak traces seen, between the 60kHz related lines. Rtty midband off for long periods and 60kHz on at all times, in spite of the pundits pred
