Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW...

[PETER CLEALL <peter.cleall@virgin.net>]

I suggest you go to Google and put "Alberto di Bene" in the search criteria before you critise and  beleive that failure to have a qso with you is  a failure to contribute to LF/MF

regards

peter G8AFN

2010/1/11 mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>

Om
Like you suggest two licences A and B

Licence A
Radio Amateurs that can communicate using Morse Code and use a soldering
iron to build a wireless and communicate.

Licence B
Appliance Operators that mind machines to communicate on their behalf
especially when they are asleep and cannot do any of the above. I realize
Italy is a hot country and they need a lot of siesta time therefore this
class would be most suitable.for them.

What experience do you have on LF/MF and preferred modes. I cannot recall
when we had a QSO or heard you.

G3KEV

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alberto di Bene" <dibene@usa.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>

Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW...

> > Self-training = learning something, by your own endeavours
> >
> > Radio Communications = the whole gamut of science & engineering involved
> > in generating, radiating, receiving and detecting signals at radio
> > frequencies.
> >
> > Where does it prescribe that one must pass 2-way messages in real time
> > to undertake this "self-training"?
>
> There will not ever be an end to this dispute, unless we propose TWO kinds
of ham radio licenses...
>
> License A) Released to all whose main interest is to learn new techniques
or experiment old ones, either by building
> themselves hardware and/or software related to radio communication, where
"communication" is to be intended with the
> meaning of "conveying information at distance", with whatever
radio-related mean... let's call them "Radio Amateurs"
>
> License B) Released to all whose main interest is to use the radio to talk
with other B-licensed persons, usually of
> subjects of no or very little importance, either by using SSB modulation,
or by operating a mechanical switch that
> interrupts what otherwise would have been a CW (Continuous Wave)
carrier...  let's call them "Rags Chewers"
>
> If the two categories were allocated different frequency slots, with
substantial fines in case of invasion of the other
> slot, then we all could live in peace, without arguments whatsoever...
Radio Amateurs with Radio Amateurs, and Rags
> Chewers with Rags Chewers....
>
> 73  Alberto  I2PHD
>
>
>