Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 246 ]

Total 246 documents matching your query.

21. Re: LF: Now using Mini Whip here on 8970 Hz in JO33kh, Appingedam (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:06:21 +0100
Ha Ha, well that proofs that I actualy did the measurement's :-) Later this week I will check if the offset has to set to 0 or perhaps -0.0016 Hz 73's and tnx for info. Peter de PA1SDB -- Original Me
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00646.html (15,955 bytes)

22. Re: LF: Now using Mini Whip here on 8970 Hz in JO33kh, Appingedam (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 01:10:30 +0100
Hello, I did just check the error on 11.904,761 KHz. " Effect of FFT settings with fs= 48.0000 kHz: Width of one FFT-bin: 423.855 uHz Equiv. noise bandwidth: 635.783 uHz Max freq range: 8.91444 kHz .
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00651.html (20,557 bytes)

23. LF: Re: Power experiment / Mini Whip / 8970 Hz ! (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:48:15 +0100
OOps.. The PA0RDT Mini Whip... How do you all power your PD0RTD Mini Whip ? Best 73's, de PA1SDB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00685.html (10,232 bytes)

24. Re: LF: Re: Power experiment / Mini Whip / 8970 Hz ! (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:45:58 +0100
Hello Roelof, U use the 2N5109 like you suggested :-) Also that J310 Fet. Also the 470 uH chokes. I did try to keep it orginal as you did designed it. Also PCB is the same (90 x 30 totaly and 45 x 30
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00700.html (11,631 bytes)

25. Re: LF: Re: Today... (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:39:51 +0100
Hello Stefan, I did already re-build the LF RX situation here befor your mail came in. I went back to 9 Khz already and was not able to do that noise measurement test. I'm not sure why you are 'only'
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00713.html (12,319 bytes)

26. LF: 24h of 8.970KHz in Appingedam @ PA1SDB (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:33:22 +0100
Hello VLF, This what I see here over the last 24h. I think the strongest signal is visible on 8970,022 Hz. If I close one eye, then I think to see also traces on 8970,002 Hz over the night. Yesterday
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00746.html (12,582 bytes)

27. LF: Now using Mini Whip here on 8970 Hz in JO33kh, Appingedam (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 21:33:16 +0100
Hello all, Today I did plant the "PA0RDT Mini-Whip" antenna in the backyard at about 20 meters from the house and 4 meters above ground level. Last 2 week I was using 2 pasive loop antenna's who wher
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-03/msg00798.html (12,851 bytes)

28. LF: Alpha's back to' normal' QRG. (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:52:51 +0100
VLF, After a short break between about 10 and 17 h UTC yesterday, the 3 Alfa's are back at the usual frequency... Peter - PA1SDB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00010.html (9,204 bytes)

29. Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:11:08 +0100
Hello Wolf, Stefan, Andy, Eddie, VLF. Tnx all for the info about generating a stable signal on 8970.1 Hz. I have here 2 other PC's/(older) notebooks where I like to do experiments with, and also on t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00023.html (12,850 bytes)

30. Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:25:13 +0100
Hello Stefan, VLF, I think you are very lucky with a PC that generates such a stable signal. use the digimode frequencies given by the receive side i a stable trace. :-) > I tried two notebooks now.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00046.html (13,642 bytes)

31. Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:12:52 +0100
Tnx Eddie, Lets see what happens from now on (11h00 UTC) I have now configured a continue test tone at 8970.1 Hz in that Digimode terminal. SR cal is locked at 22KC1 A few 100 mW of notebook audio in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00072.html (17,244 bytes)

32. Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:13:47 +0100
Hi Eddie, No, I did'nt use that Digimode terminal to generate a signal, but just the Signal generator in that Components / Circuit window. 73s Peter. PA1SDB -- Original Message -- From: qrss@talktalk
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00079.html (16,006 bytes)

33. LF: Re: PA3CPM, DK8KW, DJ2LF, DF6NM on air ! (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:52:19 +0100
Hello VLF, This is what I did receive this afternoon (1th of April, 2012) Very weak but a straight trace at 8970 Hz. I think one of the stations on 8970 Hz did drift 0.0004 Hz (or so) down today. Can
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00082.html (13,206 bytes)

34. LF: Re: castle (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 23:55:57 +0100
Hello Uwe, You are not far from my QTH Uwe if you are in jo43sv. Abt 133 km. Closer in relation to PA3CPM, 170 km. But I don't understend where to look for you ! What is CASTLE mode ? Where can I fin
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00096.html (12,861 bytes)

35. LF: PA3CPM, DK8KW, DJ2LF, DF6NM on air ! (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2012 16:50:40 +0100
Hello, That peak at 8970 Hz looks good, isn't it !? It takes unfortunately a few hours befor something gets visible at 47 uHz. It it not clair who of you both this is. There are two stations on exact
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00106.html (11,247 bytes)

36. Re: LF: 8970 Hertz this weekend in Appingedam (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:19:44 +0100
Strange, others to ? Uwe, I try send U personal that pic. De PA1SDB -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] [email protected] To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_group@black
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00107.html (11,318 bytes)

37. Re: LF: 8WX on the Air !? (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:02:26 +0100
Hello Uwe, I think the TX was switched off at 09h45m UTC today.... There is not much difference in signal level in relation to the weekend broadcast. Most bright pixel 13/4 was at 23h with level -120
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00108.html (13,318 bytes)

38. Re: LF: info about better digital mode in 2200m band (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:08:30 +0100
Hello Mauro, Did you take notice about my experiments regarding feeding the antenna with a battery ? Take a look at the pictures around the 25th of March in that log: http://www.qsl.net/pa1sdb/Experi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00113.html (14,793 bytes)

39. Re: LF: info about better digital mode in 2200m band (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 15:47:37 +0100
O.K. Mauro, Let us know if you found the sollution in your noisy case :-) 73s, Peter - PA1SDB Hi Peter, yes, I read your experiences .. My antenna was already powered by battery .. I think my problem
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00166.html (17,006 bytes)

40. Re: LF: Generating 8970 Hz carrier with Spectrum Lab ? (score: 1)
Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:49:19 +0100
No problem Eddie. If it fails, "no man over board". (dutch saying :-) In the few weeks that I'm here, I did learn a lot about S.L. Locking, uHz, etc. And learn to have patience :-) 73's, Peter PA1SDB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-04/msg00167.html (18,800 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu