Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Re: Tree noise (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:24:12 +0100
Dennis and Dave Evidence so far: 1. Experiments in loading 50 foot (15m) evergreen fir tree for operation on 3.7MHz. 1.5metre diameter tuned loop and novel (G3LHZ) tuned coiled hairpin tried as tree
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00047.html (15,772 bytes)

2. LF: Re: Tree noise (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:44:23 +0100
Dennis (DL6NVC) Please could you try your loop away from the tree. Preferably more than 2 metres. I have found severe bio-electric(?) noise from trees from 3.5 to 500MHz.using loops, whips and UHF Ya
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-08/msg00220.html (11,754 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Re: E-Field Probe calibration question (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 14:51:49 +0100
Andy If or when all else has failed why not try the (my?) "two identical antenna method"? Set up a pair of two identical short whips about 30 to 50m apart on reasonably uniform ground. they should be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00519.html (15,048 bytes)

4. LF: Re: Pretests for the 630m band dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:37:53 +0100
Stefan As a long time 'lurker' on this LF group I am particularly interested in what orientation you plan for your low height 630m band dipole antenna and what azimuthal radiation pattern you find. A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-07/msg00452.html (16,979 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Re: Pretests for the 630m band dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:32:16 +0100
Hello Stefan, and thanks for interesting reply. But a few more comments before I go back to lurking. As yet I am not signed up to lurk also on the yahoo reflector. Perhaps I will when a bit less busy
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-07/msg00486.html (13,557 bytes)

6. LF: RE: Telephone wires (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 16:43:33 +0100
The legal phrase to use is "I find that I do not have any record of your way-leave for these lines". It works! I got wires and a telephone pole moved for no charge on this basis Mike - G3LHZ neighbou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00130.html (10,218 bytes)

7. RE: LF: RE: Telephone and Electricity wires (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:16:08 +0100
By the way I also got an electricity pole supplying my neighbours removed from my garden (previous QTH) at the same time as the telephone wires, using the same legal clause. The neighbours' telephone
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00140.html (12,084 bytes)

8. RE: LF: Untuned and tuned loops (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:38:27 +0100
Dear Andy, Jim, LF Group, My strong support for what Jim has said.  The immediate environment always affects all field measurements, not just magnetic field measurements. Marcus&#8217;s formula is co
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-03/msg00281.html (26,164 bytes)

9. RE: LF: Untuned and tuned loops (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:29:34 +0100
Dear Markus (and LF Group) Thank you very much for your very useful comments.  I have a few further comments. (a) On  item 3. below:  It is useful to note that reflection at the walls of a waveguide
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-03/msg00284.html (24,390 bytes)

10. LF: RE: Re: Reception with multiple antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 14:51:55 +0100
Dear Alan/Mike/Group I think that reception with multiple antennas is a very interesting suggestion/proposal. Here are some 'bookwork' theoretical points which could be taken into consideration? Opti
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-05/msg00168.html (19,425 bytes)

11. LF: RE: Soil Conductivity Measurement (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:03:18 +0100
Uwe, I would be very interested in a plot of how the conductivity has varied over the year and in what the largest variation of maximum to minimum that you have found?  It would also be useful to mea
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-08/msg00206.html (13,495 bytes)

12. LF: RE: DCF77 request for DX reception reports (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:39:39 +0100
I should have added that the DCF77 transmitter is on 77.5 kHz and is located 25km SE from Frankfurt (a. Main).
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00035.html (9,378 bytes)

13. LF: DCF77 request for DX reception reports (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 10:25:31 +0100
Dear Group I was at PTB Braunschweig yesterday and saw the atomic clocks for the DCF77 time signal on 77kHz. Juergen Becker on email [email protected] , an engineer responsible for time dissemina
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-03/msg00112.html (9,218 bytes)

14. LF: RE: Filter expert needed - Mystery of the lost real zero. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:53:04 +0100
Andy A correction: I should have said in series with and not across. So that my post should read: For a second zero on the HF side try an inductor in series with the zero capacitor. The trouble is th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00117.html (12,439 bytes)

15. LF: RE: Filter expert needed - Mystery of the lost real zero. (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Underhill" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:33:10 +0100
Andy For a second zero on the HF side try an inductor across the zero capacitor. The trouble is that it will have to have the same reactance as this 1.5p capacitor and that may not be easily realisab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-04/msg00118.html (16,710 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu