RE: LF: RE: Telephone and Electricity wires

["Mike Underhill" <mike@underhill.co.uk>]

By the way I also got an electricity pole supplying my neighbours removed
from my garden (previous QTH) at the same time as the telephone wires, using
the same legal clause. The neighbours' telephone wires were also attached to
my chimney and that also legally required a wayleave. In my case all poles
and neighbours' wires were removed at no cost to me.  Unfortunately the
neighbours were charged and that did not make me popular for a while!   

Mike - G3LHZ

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-
> rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of captbrian
> Sent: 17 November 2004 19:39
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: RE: Telephone wires
>
> slight problem. BT line for my phone is ok with me [d'ruther have it
> buried
> tho' ] but neighbours lines are a nuisance LOL !!>:
>
> > The legal phrase to use is "I find that I do not have any record of your
> > way-leave for these lines".  It works! I got wires and a telephone pole
> > moved for no charge on this basis
> >
> > Mike - G3LHZ
> >
> > > Subject: LF: Telephone wires
> > >
> > > neighbours telephone wires across my garden are an upcoming hazard for
> me
> > > also.
> > >
> > > Why not tell phone company to take 'em away?
> > > Did they ask your permission to put 'em there?
> > >
> > > Bryan g3gvb ( In w-land this month tho' ]
> > >
> > > Quoting Lawrence Mayhead G3AQC <laurie@g3aqc.freeserve.co.uk>:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------
> This mail sent through http://www.ukonline.net