Revision 2786 of the experimental program WSJT-X has been posted. As usual, a link to it appears on the WSJT web site: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html The following is a direct lin
That's correct. In the next release I'll tryto remember to replace the file with one that has a valid header. In the meantime, feel free to patch the header yourself! -- Joe, K1JT Using version WSJTX
A new revision of WSJT-X has been posted. As usual, a link to it appears on the WSJT web site: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html The following is a direct link to the installation fi
Hi Stefan A general question to the NB: What do you think about its performance in the current state? Normally NB is disabled when starting the program. Applying a NB to "remove" QRN makes a big effe
Send me your file from 2056 UTC My first transmission using v2711 monitored in the shack *exactly as previously described and failed with v2706* :- 2054 10 2 0.1 1401.37 0.00 G3ZJO IO92 Some one call
Hi Markus, Stefan, and all, It appears that you have things working reasonably well in JT9-1. Here are the decodes Markus received from Stefan: UTC Sync dB DT Freq Drift Message -- 1916 10 4 1.4 1940
A new revision of WSJT-X has been posted at http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_02r2713.exe Changes from r2711 include the following: 1. Updates to the Quick-Start User's Guide, http://www
A new revision of the experimental program WSJT-X has been posted. As usual, a link to it appears on the WSJT web site: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html The following is a direct li
Yes, email is OK. Thanks! -- Joe 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T JT9 performance may be degraded in the presence of QRM, static crashes, plasma TV birdies, frequency drift, etc. Extensive experience with JT65 o
Hi Markus, Ooooh! That's embarrassing. I'll be sure it's fixed in the next release. Thanks for catching this bug. -- Joe, K1JT playing with the message entry in wsjt-x r 2786, I stumbled upon this st
Revision 2788 of the experimental program WSJT-X has been posted. As usual, a link to it appears on the WSJT web site: http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html The following is a direct lin
Hi Eddie, After a program crash, please report 1. What was the program doing just before the crash? 2. Was anything written to a file named "wsjtx.log" ? 3. Can you reproduce the problem? If so, desc
Hi Eddie, Tobias, and all, I've solved the riddle of Eddie's local JT9-2 transmissions that failed to decode. The problem is, as originally suspected, the result of small frequency drifts -- in this
One more message for today. There's a problem in a file named jt9.exe in the WSJT-X r2783 distribution. It causes high CPU load for no good reason. I will package a new release fixing this problem to
Hi Markus, I have fixed the strange bug you reported. It will be OK in the next release. I should have responded also to the question you posed: ... I'm often unsure about what is a predefined token
Hi Wolf, For the WSJT experiments, I had installed Dimension 4 on a windows 7 machine. Seemed to work (at least I thought), but then I made these observations: ... Recent versions of Windows do not p
Many thanks to all those who have sent *.wav files of JT9 signals, as well as comments on early release(s) of the WSJT-X program. They are much appreciated -- and much has been learned from them, alr
Hi Markus, On 11/1/2012 6:24 AM, Markus Vester wrote: Three times "DK7FC JN49QRP" decoded in JT9-2, and a couple of "DK7FC JN49IK" in five minute mode with +9 dB SNR. But our well known friend "15P67
Hi Stefan, Well, the QRN on LF is quite different to that on HF. So probably the optimised parameter settings (to be found) will be quite different as well. Yes. That's why I have encouraged you and
I have been saying that there would be no new release of WSJT-X until after my return from travel on November 12. However, I found some time today to work on the program before my departure. The resu
