Dear Jim and group, the fair opens at 08:00 UTC and closes at 18:00 UTC both Saturday and Sunday... Dear LF Group, Unfortunately, a couple of problems have cropped up - First, my antenna has blown do
At 18:19 25/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: Hello Group, as the subject of this message says, I am gently reminding you to put some signals (QRSS, DFCW, Jason...) on the LF band for our hamfest of Saturday
Dear LF Group, Will run the Jason beacon again this evening from about 2300 for a few hours. Frequency 135.990kHz +/-. All reports welcome. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU
Gain is only obtained from directivity. Directivity can be calculated from physical considerations but the equation to obtain gain from directivity is G = e*D , where G = power gain, D = directivity,
Dear LF Group, I copied G3JKV's 2W Jason beacon signal without problems last night - The signal was S6 here, so no great difficulty! After that, I had a CW QSO with OH1TN. Reino remarked that he had
Dear Andy, LF Group, At 14:54 24/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: All three of these modes use the same basic technique, looking for the presence or absence of a signal in a given bandwidth - in the case of
Dear LF Group, No beacon sigs from M0BMU tonight - I'm taking the night off! Will run some more tests over the weekend, so if you have anything particular in mind, please let me know. Cheers, Jim Mor
Dear LF Group, Many thanks for the reports on the Jason beacon sigs last night from OE5EEP, SM6LKM, I2PHD, IK2PII, CT1DRP, and to anyone else who was listening . I started late, about 2015, after hav
Dear LF Group, I'll try to run the Jason beacon from about 2000utc until 2100 or so on 135.910kHz, and from 2300 until 0100 or later on 135.990kHz, just for a change and to see if this frequency is a
May I look at it the other way? 137.5xxx is an absolute mass of lines here. 73, Brian 73 Brian CT1DRP IN51QD 41 09 58N 08 39 11W http://homepage.esoterica.pt/~brian Dear Brian, So if I transmit a bea
Dear LF Group, Thanks to I2PHD, DJ8WX, NL9222, G3NYK for the reports and images, and to anybody else who was watching for my Jason v0.92 test sigs. I transmitted on 137.510 from about 2030 - 2210, an
Dear Mal, LF Group, At 18:36 22/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: Dont swamp the QRS operators with 4hz B/W signal around 135.923 plus/minus, this has happened before with the 7 level fsk, and is not appreci
Dear Mal, LF Group, At 14:20 22/01/2002 +0000, you wrote: Ref your recent power measurements on the MM0ALM signal and observations. I have measured you power and observed two readings. One set of fig
Dear LF Group, I successfully tested Jason 0.92 with 1.2kW TX out last night (If anyone was listening, at around 0400 - don't ask!). So I will give it a go tonight if anyone is interested. I will try
Dear Mal, LF group, Of course, any self-respecting, competent CW operator (well, allright, CW and QRSS operator these days) would never consider anything less than a MERCEDES JEEP... Cheers, Jim Mori
Dear Walter, LF Group, Mal G3KEV has a competitor for the biggest 136 sig in the UK. I heard MM0ALM wkg DJ9IE yesterday and he was 8 dB stronger than 'KEV here although almost twice as far away. Said
Hi Jim, I have been unable to reproduce this behaviour... even if changing center frequency while transmitting, everytime it worked ok. Of course the new frequency is used at the next tone time, but
Dear Alberto, A query -What range of sound card audio frequencies can be used by Jason? Also, another "wouldn't it be nice if...." request to waste more of your valuable weekend - perhaps Jason could
Dear Alberto, LF group, I tried version 0.91 of Jason on my 300MHz PC and also on a P133 - I was able to receive 'YXM on both, although only the "slow" mode worked on the 133MHz machine as you would
Dear Alberto, LF Group At 14:30 16/01/2002 +0100, you wrote: So, what would all you judge more important, sideband independence, or bandwidth used ? Your vote will decide the final format for Jason.
