Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 737 ]

Total 737 documents matching your query.

321. Re: LF: RE: where are all the grabbers gone ... (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:01:33 +0000
Hello Graham, LF, Yes - I don't think I missed any periods, except of course when listening elsewhere - hi! - so the new soundcard seems to have cured the problem. None at the moment. The original cl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00719.html (11,570 bytes)

322. Re: LF: QRP WSPR beacon (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:06:15 +0000
Hello Andy, LF, I'm also monitoring for Andy's WSPR signal, by I think it's optimistic to hope for reception at this range, in daylight, of a -6dBm ERP transmission. I will leave it running unitl 20:
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00723.html (9,486 bytes)

323. Re: LF: RE: G0NBD WSPR 503.637 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:16:31 +0000
Hello LF, I'm also seeing what I believe to be M0BMU, but right at the bottom of the "window" and not decoding, despite a very strong trace. Jim. can you move up 50Hz or so? Say 503.550? I'm off to b
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00724.html (9,999 bytes)

324. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:25:52 +0000
Andy,LF WSPR can be configured to automatically uplaod its received data to a website at http://wsprnet.org The database has had a revamp recently, and the "default" view doesn't allow you to select
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00741.html (14,593 bytes)

325. Re: LF: RE: RE: WSPR Distance (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:11:52 +0000
Lee, LF, Yes, there does seem to be some problem with the reporting of your distances - at least between you and me. It's wierd to see Andt JNT reported to be nearer than yourself, as last time I was
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00752.html (10,547 bytes)

326. Re: LF: Re: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:42:26 +0000
Except that Mal hasn't got DXCC yet for 500Khz, so obviously there's one thing, and only one thing, that's worth persuing on MF....
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00773.html (11,259 bytes)

327. Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR tests (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:32:11 +0000
Thanks for running it for so many hours Jim, I didn't get a chance yesterday to do much monitoring, but I set up a grabber to watch for OH1LSQ, and have kept each 5-minute capture showing the range 1
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00778.html (11,042 bytes)

328. Re: LF: Re: WSPR beacon on 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:55:33 +0000
Got them both in the 23:46 period! Jim -12 Markus -13 This is very encouraging! John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00800.html (10,625 bytes)

329. Re: LF: WSPR beacon on 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:48:01 +0000
Jim, LF, Yes, on this point I'd agree, and it's probably why I did okay on 500kHz, up to a point. However the lack of ANYTHING tall in the adjacent area makes it awfully tricky to hang any respectabl
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00805.html (12,176 bytes)

330. Re: LF: Re: Silent majority (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:11:47 +0000
This will test the CW rise/fall time shaping of all these class d/e home made manual telegraphy transmitters. It will also require that the CW operators remain below 12wpm. John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00818.html (9,995 bytes)

331. LF: G4WGT WSPR 503.599 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:17:20 +0000
Hello Gary, LF 090118 1714 8 -25 1.1 0.503599 G4WGT IO83 37 First WSPR on 500kHz Reporting to WSPRNET Cheers, John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00854.html (7,826 bytes)

332. Re: LF: PSK CONTACT G4JNT - M0BMU (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:53:01 +0000
What's the "out and back" time for a message to Pluto? Might be a long wait to find out "it's not raining also" John
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00945.html (10,750 bytes)

333. Re: LF: Freq. question. (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:48:23 +0000
Hello JB, Not really on topic for LF, but.... DSC is "Digital Selective Calling" - a part of the maritime safety system GMDSS. It allows individual stations/ships etc to be called for routine traffic
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00975.html (12,931 bytes)

334. Re: LF: RE: M0LMH in WSPR had to look twice ! (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:58:50 +0000
Hello Lee, LF I was glad to see your signal on the brief trip down to 502.4 and I've no doubt had I stayed longer on frequency I'd have received more from you and at higher S/N ratios. I see from the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00977.html (10,482 bytes)

335. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:03:29 +0000
Hello Gary, LF WSPR itself only transmits the 4-figures (eg IO90) but if you enter all 6 in the options dialogue of the software (along with your correct callsign, NOT K1JT - hi!) then any spots you
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00983.html (12,640 bytes)

336. Re: LF: RE: where are all the grabbers gone ... (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 12:48:55 +0000
Hello Rik, Gary et al, My 500kHz grabber is, in general, offline at the moment. Occasionally I run a temporary setup, as when Paul-Henrik was testing on 136 recently, using my IC-R75 - which is my ma
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00989.html (12,227 bytes)

337. Re: LF: RE: where are all the grabbers gone ... (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:47:33 +0000
Yes. I think it might do, we should try one night. Don't believe my freq calibration - the R75 doesn't have the high stab osc, and its internal master osc hasn't been tweaked - although it seems pret
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00997.html (11,291 bytes)

338. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:04:30 +0000
Oh no! Please let's not get into this again.... At the moment there is no bandplan, but general concensus would indicate "beacons at the band edges - real QSOs in the middle". The current WSPR activi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01033.html (11,420 bytes)

339. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR beacon on 136kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:10:41 +0000
Hello Markus, LF, Yes, please switch on again, I'll watch now, from Shetland, 73 John GM4SLV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01077.html (10,856 bytes)

340. Re: LF: WSPR Beacon on 137.500kHz (score: 1)
Author: John P-G <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:36:08 +0000
Jim, LF, I'll stop the Spec Lab capture looking for OH1LSQ and have a look for your WSPR, to compare to the last 2 night's results. Cheers, John GM4SLV
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg01080.html (9,217 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu