Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 233 ]

Total 233 documents matching your query.

41. Re: AW: AW: LF: 8.97kHz antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:56:46 +0000 (GMT)
Oh, i am too far. My loc is mo64rx. Seems abt 5000km or more. Besides my location is too noisy (large plant at 100 m). Regards, Alexander
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00614.html (10,319 bytes)

42. Re: LF: 12 km on Dream(ers) Band (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 15:20:51 +0000 (GMT)
Congradulations, Markus! 12km is well out of near reactive zone. Thus further dictance increasing is not too dificult:-) This corresponds well with previous mesurements. Regards, Alexander/RA9MB
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00619.html (10,565 bytes)

43. Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:23:05 +0000 (GMT)
Wow! Regards, Alexander
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00632.html (10,768 bytes)

44. Re: LF: Ionospheric VLF propagation (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:03:44 +0000 (GMT)
By the way it is very close to estimation: E(800km) ~ E(100km)*sqrt(100km/800km) where E(100km) calculated without ionospere, as you, Markus, calculated. Certanly it is very rought formala. Up to the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00633.html (9,928 bytes)

45. Re: LF: VLF TX experiments_short report (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:40:21 +0000 (GMT)
Dear Stefan 3.2 kV (6 dB of 1.6 kV) is too low voltage. Expectations was 20 kV before. Is it any typo? Regards, Alexander
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00646.html (10,440 bytes)

46. Re: VLF: TA, 300m and new PA? (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:21:17 +0000 (GMT)
Paul, parameter 'a' may be essentually larger if signal propagated over salt water. It depends on deposit of ionosphere and ground to attenuation. Thus nice theoretical problem arises. We can rather
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00650.html (11,795 bytes)

47. Re: LF: 9kHz without high voltage (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 18:17:31 +0000 (GMT)
Dear Jim, to get constant Q one should scale coil dimension as sqare root of wavelength (if neglect dielectric losses). May be it sounds strange but it is so, sure. Conventional scaling wellknown in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-03/msg00674.html (9,558 bytes)

48. Re: LF: Pic or Atmel? (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:39:21 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Stefan, Wolf BTW using FpGA from Xilinx or Altera anybody can easy build CPU with any instruction set you like. Whith all perepheral devices (and RAM) in the same crystall. It's my favorit 'toy' n
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00707.html (8,907 bytes)

49. Re: LF: QRSS today (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 18:30:21 +0000 (GMT)
Hi John. Did anyone see anything of the Russian expedition? I have seen nothing despite continuous monitoring and seeing all the stations reported by others.<br /> See oh2aq dx summit. There is some
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00005.html (8,276 bytes)

50. LF: UA6 activity... (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 20:42:11 +0000 (GMT)
Hellow Group. Has anybody any info on UA6 activity? Or may be sombody has hear them? I have increase my RX sensativity and build loop antenna but nothin hear yet (13-00Z). I hope to hear them in norm
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00020.html (7,699 bytes)

51. Re: LF: transmitting loops (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:27:43 +0000 (GMT)
Hello Rik and Group. 1. Does someone has a formula that has proven to be usable for big loops. About 7 years ago I have derived formula for circular loop. It is very simple L=D*N^2. Where D is diamet
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00030.html (8,966 bytes)

52. Re: LF: Beeps (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:39:17 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Fabian and Group. I can't imagine how computer or TV set can generate such a regular continuos (many hours) signal. Hi Alex, I hear similar QRM with a certain 'beat' on LF sometimes which most lik
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00034.html (8,733 bytes)

53. LF: Beeps (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 23:39:07 +0000 (GMT)
Hellow, Group. All this evening (now 15-55 Z, 21-55 local) I hear someone "beep-beep-beep.." near 137.6 kHz. I can't define frequensy exectly yet. There is about 90 "beeps" per minute. What can it be
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00039.html (7,886 bytes)

54. LF: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 00:33:05 +0000 (GMT)
Hi, Group. Some guy told me that QRSS mode uses frequency shift keying not amplitude keying. Is it true? 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00045.html (7,953 bytes)

55. RE: LF: back conversion (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 22:51:51 +0000 (GMT)
Hi, Larry and Group. Yes, it's. Alex, I will be hopefully returning to 136 with as much as a Decca amp can make from 70V DC at 25 Amps starting after August this coming year. It seems to be more then
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00049.html (8,907 bytes)

56. Re: LF: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:19:10 +0000 (GMT)
Hellow LF Group. If you prefer not to use a PC to transmit QRSS you can indeed program a PIC, it will be OK for beacon transmissions but might be a bit complicated for a 2-way QSO to change the text.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00051.html (10,355 bytes)

57. LF: QRSS (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:47:34 +0000 (GMT)
Hello, Rik ang LF Group. You are in the range of 4000 to 4700 km of most European LF stations. That might be a bit too much for normal CW. But trans-atlantic tests in the past years have shown that w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00057.html (10,597 bytes)

58. Re: LF: Ground loss (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 22:46:35 +0000 (GMT)
Hi, Jim and Group. Will be interested to hear about any of your investigations on this subject. OK. If I'll get any sucsess in such an investigation I'll send info. Just yesterday I have understand t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00067.html (10,138 bytes)

59. Re: LF: Proximity effect (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:44:09 +0000 (GMT)
Hi, Stewart ang Group. A very brief look at Balanis "Antenna Theory" has the passing comment that proximity effect can lead to greater loss than skin effect (on a discussion on small loops). He refer
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00073.html (9,049 bytes)

60. RE: LF: Ground loss (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander S. Yurkov" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 21:01:18 +0000 (GMT)
Hi John and group! Thanks a lot for your coments. It is a very interesting subject for me because I am not a HAM only but a physicist also. I have do some theoretical investigation of power absorptio
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-03/msg00086.html (11,287 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu