Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 490 ]

Total 490 documents matching your query.

101. Re: LF: First Linear data qso G4WGT / G0NBD (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:02:52 +0000
My NoV for 500kHz came through yesterday, authorising 0dBW ERP, modes FSK, PSK, MSK and TBD just as I'd asked for. It also allows ASK, but didn't specifically request that :-) This morning got the 7m
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00486.html (14,807 bytes)

102. Re: LF: WSPR Distance (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:25:27 +0000
ps I've started a grabber showing 503.5 - 504.1 and also I notice strong traces on the WSPR waterfall at 503.900 from I believe M0BMU, but very few decodes? I don't usually have a problem with Jim's
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00491.html (12,075 bytes)

103. LF: QRP WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:19:38 +0000
The figures won't go below 0dBm so they will no longer be a true representation of tx power. WSPRnet is still reporting several listeners copying my sigs, now at -28dB S/N, so will continue decreasi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00507.html (9,765 bytes)

104. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:21:52 +0000
I didn't say that. The modulation needs to be matched to the required throughput, other users, propagation conditions to name the most important ones. At the moment, both those modes appear to be par
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00522.html (19,604 bytes)

105. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:26:43 +0000
Are you implying that the zone below 503.900 is not quiet ? Is it worth me moving to a frequency above .900 ? Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00526.html (13,779 bytes)

106. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:40:37 +0000
Jim is 10 - 11dB SNR apart from the transmission at 1622 when there was a dropout of some kind in his signal Was about to say there's QRM on Jims signal (at 1639z), but its that funny on-off mode, de
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00553.html (11,183 bytes)

107. Re: LF: PSK CONTACT G4JNT - M0BMU (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:14:55 +0000
I don't. Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00570.html (11,943 bytes)

108. LF: 'JNT QRP WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:54:28 +0000
Now dropped to 33% duty cycle - its getting busier out there. Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00584.html (8,645 bytes)

109. Re: LF: LF V MF (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:45:47 +0000
Now, 73kHz was a real MANs band - never worked you then, Mal. Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00590.html (9,966 bytes)

110. Re: LF: WSPR 503.471 G4JNT (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 10:00:04 +0000
I thought I'd set an ERP of 25dBm in the setup, will have to check... My ERP is around that figure when hitting antenna with 80 Watts. Not too happy with the WSPR windoze software. The COM port opera
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00655.html (11,320 bytes)

111. Re: LF: Re: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:14:30 +0000
Went to PSK31 for a one way QSO with G0API a few minutes ago. Dropped to 503.4 for that so hope it didn't splatter your reception of JIm. Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00665.html (12,308 bytes)

112. Re: LF: PSK CONTACT G4JNT - M0BMU (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 21:04:58 +0000
Amateur bands are typically 2 to 10% of their centre frequency, so lets take a figure of 5%, giving a useable band 95uHz wide. Allow a waveform that criutically fits inside this bandwidth - OFDM or M
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00680.html (13,516 bytes)

113. Re: LF: RE: Olivia 8 x 250 / psk31 / MFSK 8 503 CENTER BEACON - RUNNING NOW - 1615 HRS (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:38:05 +0000
But have you thought about the power DENSITY. Its a well known fact that spreading a signal in frequency improves channel usage and assists weak signalling - go back to Shannon's eqn. Look at first G
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00705.html (21,176 bytes)

114. Re: LF: Re: WSPR 503.5 (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 17:40:27 +0000
Is there some sort of unofficial bandplan on this band? I'm rather late coming on to it having only got the NoV last week, and haven't followed the reflector over the last year or two (microwaves wer
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00712.html (12,905 bytes)

115. LF: 500kHz NoV (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:50:39 +0000
Does anyone have a copy of an electronic version of the NoV application form? The .PDF on the Ofcom website looks to be a standard doc for printing and filling out by hand. Not having handwriting fon
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00713.html (9,156 bytes)

116. Re: LF: Re: rectifiers (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:01:56 +0000
No, but I don't see any reason why they won't work at 50Hz just as well as normal ones. In fact better, due to the lower Vf. Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00832.html (13,679 bytes)

117. Re: LF: Re: Low power olivia beacon 503 khz cent freq (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:37:34 +0000
If you have a radio with adjustable CW mode like most SDRs, and the RA1792, its easier to use CW mode. Tune to the centre frequency of interest, set the filter appropriately and the BFO to the decode
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00834.html (17,423 bytes)

118. Re: LF: Re: Censorship (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:06:01 +0000
Come on then - explain :-) Never even heard of GR-874 Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00845.html (11,575 bytes)

119. LF: 500kHz SRPs (score: 1)
Author: "Andy Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:46:21 +0000
I've just applied for an SRP for 501kHz, and noticed on the RSGB Spectrum Forum website, the existing extension was only until Feb 2009. Is there any update on that? Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00846.html (8,806 bytes)

120. Re: LF: Re: rectifiers (score: 1)
Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:29:11 +0000
Quite likely Schottky diodes. Much lower forward voltage drop - typical 0.15 to 0.3V at rated current, and OK for fasr SMPSUs. Reverse leakage can be very high. Andy G4JNT www.g4jnt.com
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2009-01/msg00894.html (12,055 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu