Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?

To:	[email protected]
Subject:	Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?
From:	Andy Talbot <[email protected]>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:26:43 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w9XADFgFCXgF8d9SjaT/0Xt+4TcgXep/IHmPsFrTBz0=; b=jxew6XJcOJ3w8tN+Vjo5R2IvaIka7L58jRp7oAZCGCA+hLXE4MrIHwSEkTxxYi66rS sOLtLivnuAZRJgrNbZyWwFb/YzWzXn2KIkhkyDtiuZOujC7Bo3pjAuQPVZC5voAtYfal Tu04QV7hKEOI3IqOrgwPXsibLjavN+FhhMlwQ=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Cd+IWBVgD3IkoAzgj32+N3uySCSpHNhm9mVkMeF/zIWbRZ6tRFDbQ26sjlctsIpmKe JvUZN8zO6qmhriNtITUV6pa6MR29IYFRc+7qH3tkTZwa1OQ8OW10uFZFXYCT9k1u1Yf1 gEZsMLwfKXJqyC5QGI405B50Q5JZkWpYIGBZU=
Domainkey-status:	good (testing)
In-reply-to:	<759A2712DACD48FB99960B59285DC59B@AGB>
References:	<B4B86DC7B7B84F648BB57AF66F5C3BBE@p4> <1922ECE26C604A598E87CB82D9D69640@JimPC> <20090126182405.26668cad@lurcher> <[email protected]> <00f601c97fe8$38429e40$6401a8c0@asus> <20090126191331.0c5922e8@lurcher> <D376124C47254F0EA1C63CAC25C5EF99@JimPC> <011401c97fef$518323f0$6401a8c0@asus> <C14EFFF8C5454C9482A231D9CE3C70F9@JimPC> <759A2712DACD48FB99960B59285DC59B@AGB>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Are you implying that the zone below 503.900 is not quiet ?
Is it worth me moving to a frequency above .900 ?

Andy  G4JNT
www.g4jnt.com



2009/1/26 Graham <[email protected]>:
> Jim,
>
> That looks to  of gone quite well , Gary has just wired me , there are some
> new stations sending in spots to
> the wspr data base
>
> only thing on the 504 signal .. the  quite zone looks to  be  only 100 hz
> wide , from  503.9 to  504
> but I don't see any false decodes at the moment ( 2 hours running) so the
> splash is 'ok'
>
> G ..
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 8:46 PM
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?
>
>>
>> Dear Gary,
>>
>> Should be fine with me - I expect someone will still be broadcasting on
>> 252kHz tomorrow!
>>
>> Cheers, Jim Moritz
>> 73 de M0BMU
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1916 - Release Date:
>> 1/26/2009 07:08
>>
>
>
>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency, (continued) LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency, James Moritz RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Gary - G4WGT RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Gary - G4WGT Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, John P-G RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Gary - G4WGT RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Dave G3WCB Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, James Moritz RE: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Gary - G4WGT Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, James Moritz Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Graham Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Andy Talbot <= Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Graham LF: 73 de LA5VNA Steinar, Graham Re: LF: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Andy Talbot Re: LF: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Graham Re: LF: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ? / page link uk500khz, Graham

Previous by Date:	LF: 600m WSPR, Johan H. Bodin
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, John P-G
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Graham
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: Re: WSPR 502.400 Dial frequency ?, Graham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]