Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 1197 ]

Total 1197 documents matching your query.

41. LF: RE: questions about a tx square loop fpr 470KHz (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 12:09:12 +0000
Hi Mauro, with this dimensions the antenna impedance will be mainly determined by the loss resistance. For a loop circumference of 20m and a 2 turn loop the copper resistance will be about 0.13 Ohm.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00001.html (12,090 bytes)

42. LF: RE: FZ-02-B mechanical filter input matching (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 05:36:35 +0000
Hi Stefan, regarding: Now my question: Is it better to remove a BF981 amp stage (about 16 dB to 18 dB gain!) in front of the mixer (SBL-3) to get a lower RX noise or do i better reduce the gain on th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00125.html (15,071 bytes)

43. RE: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 06:47:46 +0000
Hello Wolf, well said. From the IARU R1 VHF managers handbook: A valid contact is one where both operators have copied both callsigns, the report and an unambiguous confirmation. However no recourse
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00162.html (30,469 bytes)

44. RE: LF: MF 630m: False Decode or Real? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 20:39:36 +0000
Hi Andy, OK about the known callsigns. My focus was on the second part: "However no recourse should be made during the contact to obtain the required information, change of frequency, antenna directi
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00176.html (30,480 bytes)

45. RE: LF: Antennas on low bands : the Siegel and Labus books. (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 19:59:23 +0000
Hi Bob, small is a relative thing on LF. A DDRR with a perimeter of 0.25 lambda and a height of 0.025 lamdba is indeed small on 144MHz, but on 137kHz the perimeter becomes 550m and the height a respe
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00315.html (12,961 bytes)

46. RE: LF: Antennas on low bands : the Siegel and Labus books. (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 16:58:05 +0000
Hi Tom, Bob, I had a look in my Rothammel Antennenbuch (geniune "Militärverlag der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik" version, 1974) and indeed it states 0.007 lambda height. But what about ground lo
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-05/msg00329.html (12,878 bytes)

47. RE: LF: Small MF ferrite antenna games (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:05:54 +0000
Hi Stefan, getting a cardioid antenna using a magnetic ferrite rod (or loop) antenna and an small electrical antenna is very simple and done for ages in 80m ARDF (foxhunt) receivers. Sure it can be d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00018.html (24,507 bytes)

48. RE: LF: IDC-136-BLT 136kHz receivers (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 13:05:50 +0000
Hello Andy, Chris, the circuit diagram can be found in this PDF: http://icas.to/idc-136ii/idc-136ii-kit-manual-eng.pdf In contradiction to the block diagram at http://icas.to/lineup/idc-136ii-kit-eng
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-06/msg00047.html (15,713 bytes)

49. RE: LF: Protecting a MOSFET driver chip from MOSFET failure? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:35:01 +0000
Maybe also worth to mention: Capacitive coupling of the driver to the gate will reduce the peak voltage at the gate by half (assuming 50% duty cycle). The IC driver voltage should be at least 12V in
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-08/msg00094.html (18,398 bytes)

50. RE: LF: Protecting a MOSFET driver chip from MOSFET failure? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:58:04 +0000
Andy, oops, you're right. I didn't read far enough down the mail to see that you also recommended diode restoration. I have to read more careful before replying ... 73, Rik ON7YD Van: owner-rsgb_lf_g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-08/msg00100.html (20,323 bytes)

51. RE: LF: Re: RE: Folded monopole - Food for thought (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 17:54:56 +0000
HI Clemens, but on LF Rrad <<< Rloss, in that case it is very close to 6dB. And often adding a topload wire will decrease Rloss (footprint theory), so the actue gain will often be more than 6dB. 73,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-08/msg00131.html (12,820 bytes)

52. RE: LF: Windows compaible QRSS TX software? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:34:20 +0000
in that case use a USB to serial convertor (+/- 10 Euro). 73, Rik ON7YD Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Mal Hamilton [[email protected]] Verzon
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-10/msg00199.html (14,746 bytes)

53. RE: LF: Windows compaible QRSS TX software? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 16:38:26 +0000
Not sure that QRS will work with all USB to serial adapters, but I have tried several without problems. Currently I am using the popular CHIPI-X10. Available from Digikey, Mouser, Farnell etc.. at ab
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-10/msg00210.html (17,077 bytes)

54. LF: RE: [rsgb_lf_group] QRSS questions (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 21:26:13 +0000
Hello Chris, Frequency: inter-Europe QRSS (good to start with) is centered around 137.7kHz USB or CW: depend how you generate the signal. CW if you key the TX, USB if you use an audio tone. The resul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-10/msg00403.html (17,402 bytes)

55. RE: LF: Re: MF: EA8/LA3JJ (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:31:54 +0000
Hello Luis, is 472kHz included in CEPT T/R61-01 in Spain? In Belgium it is. So anyone with a CEPT-HAREC approved license can operate 472-479kHz and 501-504kHz with 5 W EIRP using ON/xxx (for a period
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-10/msg00461.html (22,127 bytes)

56. LF: RE: Zmag of 45.6 Ohms OK, or should I try for better? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:46:39 +0000
Hi Chris, I wouldn' worry about that. Assuming that you aim at 50 Ohm the SWR will be 1.1/1. This will cause a reflected power of 0.2% (or otherwise: a decrease of 0.01dB of the radiated power). 73,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-10/msg00465.html (14,185 bytes)

57. RE: LF: First of its kind? (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 19:15:32 +0000
and if I remember well PA0A has been copied at the US west coast some years ago, must also be in the 9000km range. 73, Rik ON7YD Van: [email protected] [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blackshee
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-10/msg00478.html (14,820 bytes)

58. RE: LF: Re: FR5ZX on MF WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 18:21:35 +0000
Being on holiday in I seemed to have missed some nice propagation on 472kHz. Just a thought (or 2): - With dropping solar activity it is likely that propagation will improve the coming years. - The d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00061.html (16,767 bytes)

59. RE: LF: Capacitive top hat question (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 20:07:00 +0000
Hello Stefan, Mike, I assume that a good working dipole at very low height (4m = 0.6% of lambda) is due to a poor soil. I remember to have read somewhere thate (French?) military in the Sahara desert
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00173.html (12,048 bytes)

60. RE: LF: Re: FR5ZX on MF WSPR (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:58:19 +0000
Hello Luis, the radiation resistance of your antenne is probably not the calculated 8 Ohm, due to the fact that the 80m "tower" is not perfect and will introduce some loss. Or another way to look at
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-11/msg00228.html (20,163 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu