Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Loading coil - suggestions (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:44:38 +0100
I've just spent some time constructing a new 136 kHz aerial loading coil and the results are most disappointing. . It is of basket weave construction on a 7 pointed dowelled wooden former with a mean
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00093.html (10,134 bytes)

2. LF: Loading coil - suggestions - many thanks (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:29:13 +0100
LF group Many thanks for the useful advice and information. I have printed off all comments and will have a serious re-think about my loading coil design. The wooden dowels I used were 3/8 th inch so
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00103.html (9,206 bytes)

3. LF: Loading Coils (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:20:01 +0100
Hello LF Group Many thanks for all comments and advice - most interesting. I drilled out the wooden dowels on the loading coil and replaced them with lengths of 15 mm plastic water pipe. I was unable
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00120.html (10,582 bytes)

4. LF: Receiving loop aerial - improvements (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:03:54 +0100
Hello LF Group I use a simple home built D.C. receiver for the 136 kHz band and the selectivity is rather poor. I built G3LNP's excellent rx loop when it was first published in RadCom in 1999 and it
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00154.html (8,787 bytes)

5. LF: Telephone wires (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:22:13 +0100
Hello LF Group Very many thanks for all comments and advice about my telephone wire problems. After due deliberation I shall take the easy way out and cut a metre or two from the aerial and resite th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2004-11/msg00160.html (8,429 bytes)

6. LF: QRSS - KN ? (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:56:35 +0100
LF Group Just a thought - having used QRSS-3 for a few weeks I notice that K is used exclusively and KN not at all. I often catch the end of a transmission and consequently cannot tell whether the st
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00155.html (9,086 bytes)

7. RE: LF: QRSS - KN ? (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:02:03 +0100
Many thanks Rik, I'll give it a try. 73 Chris G3XIZ Chris, Ok about KN. But in QRSS or DFCW mode you don't have to waste time and wait for a QSO to end before calling one of the stations. Just move u
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00159.html (11,333 bytes)

8. LF: RE: Re: QRSS - KN ? (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:10:29 +0100
Many thanks Alan, All noted with interest. I am always apprehensive that I may not 'see' a DX station and inadvertently call over the top of him. Thus I tend to reply on a frequency some way removed
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00160.html (12,538 bytes)

9. RE: LF: Re: RE: Re: QRSS - KN ? (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:28:24 +0100
Johan and LF Group I like the idea of a binary code. One could also use normal QRSS, a dot being a 'space' and a dash a 'mark'. Thus one would have a code book of 127 phrases (or better still 256 for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-02/msg00165.html (9,808 bytes)

10. LF: QRSS - 7 March (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:45:01 +0100
YU7AR was calling CQ on QRSS-3 at about 2020 Z last night F6BWO answered him After a few minutes YU7AR sent " ? AGN " but F6BWO had I suspect gone by then. ON7ZO then called YU7AR but got no reply. A
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-03/msg00154.html (8,773 bytes)

11. LF: Interesting E-Bay Item (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:06:21 +0100
There's an interesting item for sale on E-Bay which may be useful for LF . . ENI PL3G LOW FREQUENCY RF GENERATOR It says it's range is from 100 - 450 KHz and has an output of 0 - 3000 watts !! Unfort
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-08/msg00165.html (9,005 bytes)

12. LF: Weekend Activity (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 15:42:44 +0100
I'll put out some CW CQ calls between 0800 and 1000 GMT this Saturday and Sunday around about 136.3 kHz. M0FMT says he'll try to join me for a QSO. We're both QRP but if you can hear us we'd welcome
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-08/msg00188.html (9,188 bytes)

13. RE: LF: RE: Re: Advice will be gratefully received (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:37:11 +0100
Hi Dick, Very useful information and encouraging too that your TX is so similar to mine. I will try that resistor mod with my last few IRF520 FET's and I have now ordered a TUBE of IRF630's (200 volt
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00032.html (15,650 bytes)

14. LF: RE: Re: Advice will be gratefully received (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:01:37 +0100
Thanks for the advice Alan, It's looking like a higher voltage device may be the answer. My existing TX uses the same FET's but only runs at 24 volts. They may well be running right on their limit an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00034.html (12,940 bytes)

15. LF: RE: Re: Advice will be gratefully received (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:40:20 +0100
Thanks for the advice Jeff, All points noted. I must confess that all of the published designs seem to use a logic driver IC. I must be being awkward using an inductor :-( Maybe I'd better stick to a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00037.html (11,438 bytes)

16. RE: LF: Advice will be gratefully received (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 11:36:07 +0100
Many thanks Rik, I shall put in an order for some more robust fet's. I would have thought that the aerial system was resonant but something seems to have changed ! 73 Chris G3XIZ Chris, if the load d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00038.html (12,160 bytes)

17. LF: Advice will be gratefully received (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 10:43:34 +0100
The PA FET's in my new home brew transmitter keep exploding ! I'm using push-pull IRF520's rated at 100 V Vds and my supply is 30 volts. I am careful not to exceed the V gs. The gates are driven with
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00041.html (9,911 bytes)

18. LF: RE: RE: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:29:00 +0100
Many thanks Dave, All noted with interest and I should have no trouble now. I saw your CQ on DFCW last night, must have been about 8 'ish. I was tweaking my new RX and you were of course a colossal s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00070.html (10,614 bytes)

19. LF: RE: Re: DFCW (2...with cct) (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:30:44 +0100
Many thanks for the rapid and informative response Alan. I'd just drawn out the circuit you described then found the attachment later - doh ! The drawings were the same so your description was fine.
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00074.html (12,239 bytes)

20. LF: DFCW (score: 1)
Author: "OSBORN, Chris" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 14:56:39 +0200
My new LF TX is nearly finished and I would like to add the option of DFCW. I was thinking of just placing a varicap diode in parallel with the crystal and thus pulling the frequency for achieving th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-09/msg00078.html (8,589 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu