To: | N1BUG <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) |
From: | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:25:17 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2fCnalmXDwDHXCeTktYLjulRm0V63ZYL1PHIPhaU9vU=; b=cFuZ6NKDdUQVLU2oPwZHyOVGTdEURefiSMGl1bMoB2vrNU9GXIaLk627VjfWGspkGi oHI/xkkrdD5SilhOSzBtq2+58gcA+UPpDHtCxKHJuKZFTae6cpOf7EBW3oCKpH2QgoAZ 5qNWcbsZklrK/L25+RvxNzrqlTpAA/t8i2Li8Y8cXDLyI8X5VbzTHpXYA/wc03CIJdVG e6qL35PnwQe+sRcHPiy8dfbl3t7zEQqZ0850klbGdw6b/LJK30iSSR1TL8m+M4G/QOic e1FCSP+joh5haf+7IMhBjMHd0wVBKulPHsEITtwsCmNT0SRa5vSNCswkPXZbHpCUBFzo WzsA== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello N1BUG, Yes that would work just as well :) I tend to overcomplicate things having a small machine shop here <LOL> Thursday, January 17, 2019, 12:34:08 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, > That is an interesting idea. I think it should be a press fit to so > it doesn't tilt to the side and cause the coil winding to be a bit > loose. > I was thinking along another line. Use a machine screw through the > coil form as before (make it brass this time), but instead of > attaching the inside were lug under the screw head, bring the wire > out through a hole near the machine screw, bend it over and put a > lug on it outside. Then this lug and the one from the end of the > coil itself can be pressed against each other between two nuts (or > nut, lug, lug, lock washer, nut). The would assure better contact > and should reduce the tendency for the most critical part of the > assembly to loosen. If one were to be very paranoid, he could even > solder a short safety jumper from lug to lug. ;-) > 73, > Paul -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | R: Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), [email protected] |
Previous by Thread: | Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG |
Next by Thread: | Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Claudio Pozzi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |