R: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)

["marcocadeddu@tin.it" <marcocadeddu@tin.it>]

;-) yes indeed is a pleasure to see the fine works of Paul!

maybe this time will perform a quick fix while preparing a perfect restoration.

Paul, you already know that smoke is a fundament of LF: it make FET to function but sometime we enjoy the fireworks and I suppose that everybody here has a collection of more or less big disasters..
I remember pictures od melted shelters.. fired coils... exploded caps etc.
My gallery is also not too bad ;-) but if it doesn't make a lot of fun we can call it "experience"

73, Marco IK1HSS


----Messaggio originale----
Da: dead.fets@gmail.com
Data: 15-gen-2019 16.42
A: "N1BUG"<rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Ogg: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)



Hello N1BUG,

I  too  have had issues with bolted connections to the variometer. Not
an  expensive  fix  so  long as you don't mind a few battle scars, but
knowing  you,  you  probably  want it cosmetically perfect again ;) LF
without smoke is QRP...

Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 2:50:18 PM, you wrote:

> Thanks to all who monitored and provided reports on this latest test
> of slow JT9 modes.

> The test ended suddenly around dawn this morning. Here is the reason:

> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-1-1200.jpg

> It's the inner coil from the 2200m loading coil / variometer:

> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-0-1200.jpg

> I had hoped to be on looking for QSOs tonight, but obviously that is
> not going to be possible. I do not know when I will be QRV again.

> I have a very busy day today, so the final report on the JT9 test
> might not be ready until tomorrow.

> 73,
> Paul N1BUG




-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com