Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)

from [Chris Wilson]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	Claudio Pozzi <[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)
From:	Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:45:23 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sS8mFAbho/euyII7dUlPsGRlRxFcvcJm580eYOMqHeM=; b=ofeHgw916iuJy4UTXOwXzQVBGJPO1IDHbXoJrjtguuzxIxzbcQ7qNaOW5taMiq+NAZ QuNcY7LJosjHNp8IKv3KFj4K3TU0GItYAptE5/kkZgrcSMqQGNECjdAcvK6tA99pc116 BkpcOcjVg4qj1QZ+oMl+UKlmZ3cyjX203XGONLKQX+i3BJFIbL+NC4za7403th6+pe9G Hkx90UNTgi84TB2IN39yYoUDQk1YeVxdxsok+aGgyovrhcxf+S/1Y/UT/gplKK2ZmRCf L45PZ1Gsu1oin0aBUOBlW3F5UJm6oWQbNijtzZmlK/7CDuxSe2HYnRsOKdKPyXWFke5h B5IQ==
In-reply-to:	<1640390.jgXOhKaekd@x220>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <1640390.jgXOhKaekd@x220>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]

Hello Claudio,

Good  to 24 GHz I believe? ;) I once bought a house that had dozens of
the  things  holding  various "upgrades" to the mains wiring together!
The electric wiring survey somehow managed to miss them....

Thursday, January 17, 2019, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote:

>   
> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 01:25:17 PM you wrote:
>  
>> Hello N1BUG,
>  
>> 
>  
>> Yes  that  would  work just as well :) I tend to overcomplicate things
>  
>> having a small machine shop here <LOL>
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> My 2 c
>  
>  
>  
> Claudio, IK2PII
>  

-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:[email protected]

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
R: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), [email protected] R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), [email protected] Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Chris Wilson Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Chris Wilson Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Claudio Pozzi Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Chris Wilson <= Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Claudio Pozzi Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), jrusgrove

Previous by Date:	LF: LF EbNaut from JN64, Riccardo Zoli
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tonite, DK7FC
Previous by Thread:	Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Claudio Pozzi
Next by Thread:	Re: R: RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Claudio Pozzi
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]