To: | N1BUG <[email protected]> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) |
From: | Chris Wilson <[email protected]> |
Date: | Tue, 15 Jan 2019 15:42:29 +0000 |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kuQCOJR1/nktF5rKQAusSXj2fietx0w7MCbdAXh9Vp0=; b=u884ejwJ4fLLiiHwL4jWwSClc4GtLjI9pYgnoL/KEMAluJbtq6/1UqQOQC4mByv9jX eyB92emUIeVCPnALoKXjFlnzAsZctwNuFgTCqAVRQHtYFNcRM0lENctHtt8AqRlhAbur pWUno1ymF5tyjlNjwowELHOcTZbThmsfZHTGfKcu9m3lfUKb9WDiv36ZLcvjrm41II8i LKhKfFQ0Re0uHWh2G1q1AVN015lf/iBNIMozFaaeCQyKZhoR1AV00WswS03ut/G0A2vc 6Ti7BjpxHWwvi/8cS227cU8lZETf6L6xtARI+jVYo7fhhxoXIBfNKa4TBUXrnIDp49OD HUjg== |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
References: | <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
Hello N1BUG, I too have had issues with bolted connections to the variometer. Not an expensive fix so long as you don't mind a few battle scars, but knowing you, you probably want it cosmetically perfect again ;) LF without smoke is QRP... Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 2:50:18 PM, you wrote: > Thanks to all who monitored and provided reports on this latest test > of slow JT9 modes. > The test ended suddenly around dawn this morning. Here is the reason: > http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-1-1200.jpg > It's the inner coil from the 2200m loading coil / variometer: > http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-0-1200.jpg > I had hoped to be on looking for QSOs tonight, but obviously that is > not going to be possible. I do not know when I will be QRV again. > I have a very busy day today, so the final report on the JT9 test > might not be ready until tomorrow. > 73, > Paul N1BUG -- Best regards, Chris mailto:[email protected] |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | R: Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), [email protected] |
Previous by Thread: | LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |