To: | [email protected] |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :) |
From: | N1BUG <[email protected]> |
Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2019 06:51:59 -0500 |
Autocrypt: | addr=[email protected]; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFqj1+0BEACggWlaH8oG/AiXSUG3CeQwZ1NrVEP4U7YsA9N9XEffjCDEsnTjHF2BJSgS 2AicyomkmTGvghEHxrNFfFw07jwgJl97ae/VtNxpERPSE98mb4sPOMpJbwddioMazMDXwhKA wpg5fse+Ru8OrIT04KK919xL/pZuAP6pY6d2kVoizjJOfS71pHpiU6N6q3d9cl+w7d2LKhAE a3A1ZgDquPvn0WQlrN8K5D66xVrwTRhf1b5H4Ozl8/mMJzCeLG1ZIsDB3Pu2flwE81P8dCJA y1azwgY8pTEshVk4em/se9uRiZaDJr/qUSCf6hrV7AGa8g1jpAQDmdGpDNYMqyDqXen4jNi1 8kNFVu1BMl2vjaI8skw/YPxIxlk/0ROHYhN6SuoDq1mt4AW4FryNa7k3A8dM8Bt7udBoTv0i uw4j9R/bmh2vl/QaHRUhDco0xn2z6geWvXkKqha++vzXDrEKUuqgB85SDZPs5W/phs9p0pz1 xA61d1gn8FQJtpou5dQuAucqMo8eKQY5LUcbC+MH5pebH+M2wIuDCBmFPJHQDSPNepeaxJ4o G/HU1hrpzlgLiTTSKR8DcwtMQwYywnCTlm8MgL4jXuPzoGyKDMYyKIjC51G+3AAOJ6oXJAGR g0ehhCPtmnCGBaRlUIoUSpbgc4B+onqFKZmDiVm9CRNJhKIWrQARAQABtBZOMUJVRyA8cGF1 bEBuMWJ1Zy5jb20+iQI9BBMBCAAnBQJao9ftAhsjBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUICQoLAgQWAgMB Ah4BAheAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjPBsQAIh+Haz9gqrQJ0OlMI5xmQ0A5nsVWcatWF/Ea4mucNjL 4n4jmW+Z4Ukn3OVss55chWwrOVMRNWU2d2zRc92ZF7yJhLCoJFV870bZfxNYwdJ3GEBLIu6/ anmQYX0oXFx8UBsx5K6egNqbeflPA7zrLiQkWrz6JApECdiA1rHDjyJdS7PDxBCG9cKgr/5b r4Rn/JlUl9pRPnxlSwHXsV+J6JtFYtWI69MWIVD7Y7OY1wO9+684uOnzeDANzeIwpBDcSm6p 0D5u0b1hfPl2TD0ozVs6P0NvxkMbimXUhRR1QD0FvydyxmZTLAo+XZDGR8GqWYrYrauoRZ1h 3m23+bNT2T4AuoFnWekpsZu+sxIf0LKPtEZCa51O65jZ810ROpXg9Lx71gEoQD+kbjO69+kq 9r7wjytDq/jyhpOGrGYV6kgcQrISY86t9YvkA9Of2HDzZLih3GwecW6fkeV1AO5w4RteE9nL zIs2siGw2YqavF6LpTH71Db7cUYyZWn5hkKpwfpLNnPEuqgZACovpH1WUHx+KMqqIL4rMVCH GcSLqnH2KF4cEDb6OeTbwuLfpGlN+I3j24eQnB2uz5rDa7/IBjsClLl8S/wdDTP8IikBGixX 06v3k06tk/OF4UsfJ0cY/ASGP5+kjT4ASMZAIikwVMpKi5A5be77vecKNYlJQ2a6uQINBFqj 1+0BEACaujZXo3F17v7QTnub4DjjYvm+nr8J0uU5pPc1UMEz9eWjmtmITm15fx1hPKNtVW+I VlT+DG+ShNnYmO2M4CFBoc7PwkAOc70aDxfHz20kotvj1HhXG7oBiqPkN3TK4C7qWV1HUEPA V960qPdhsoCqmtkvNwj39w1T0ZR5qwwaqDogs9UwBib7zseQ3OXHG32xYYCMcxM35hgXGkkz R7wFL4ZnAPOeFb8LnWtZcrGpwXdsYkXuCxm+A+u9KlFY+w3ZCzZt1F9Ie+/PSZnFIUtbXt2i mfc+VkRwOLz5BDAeWuDL09TN81+gbrR3kXlymDcCbuduO/yHOQK085qzE3LuImdy+JNb7oDf 1C/hvpRvtB02vVy33rzIXT8644SJzFY/mw/W39/BgHKCoL1FrBbfgf0UoIFw5M752i7jQwmv j5yFfnVAXIPpCuusMwWMGVpZcGV7QxJxh0HBEhYgOo9v3zKwzNIPm9V/LA67u/rj4a/MlCE0 mpd6IHaePE1vXDaboPZHZdhAziru5/Jd7KQI0k+HmM/HRANPRNDZ4UeBpgj9PzS6hDN5GHlZ fRUbI8JAg9wSaQtEn0bjyaR7lw0yngZTvvjT1Qqt5zGwm1IAall2STes5xK0aS7p+UJJMVbf ydZ5VOnocvUkwYxbiqoyuVtGxi4tpWW9CRstYXMkAwARAQABiQIlBBgBCAAPBQJao9ftAhsM BQkJZgGAAAoJECRS/J8srRGjTDMP/18q7uhac/naxoFsOqhgXIlvaPgu6GX7s/QOh+bcSV1F y50lxo51P/C95H2TVME/CtCjk2xWQcNjWtXloMEsZpl7T3qWgJHvyZYkDtgh3M6UNY+zb08U K9E2+rR0AZ6zdMKio7Z1xA9BtbUpSZpvy2NgjoYVqo35NllUWMZJq0u+88PvE5WeCIqLipNI EZmUcG9UwolQbPkrRc42ReL+bFbuXGXDA5GbQ0RudXbugI8iUwaw3ftaKElIZtuHW0hw1VrU 9tVHsxKyEoKgNNT1hr+dgRmvCHmA87Pi4R5cMV0ZkLVOYfPX1motedag7HmSNPi2PkYLts4z kyvPEJe2IvaPvjvK1ShRWWgje3uytrhfwyjUZcIuA76RWEfBbwT2Mbrn9O7LvrYtbTiTlsLo Zdk2uocuefBvPd2oI7mTn5eLy/VDy2JVnlb9vpZZhriXI4KtCcP6mYyuPxlxqj/30Kn1fU5b C4EpnKy6hW1CHM42DbwzT+ChjBpFbX9bfwT4qn6d42+T4mN5wkmfnBRHfcn8Wf1ezRSK3Ome Esa3ZDssj23CZHe11uec6Ln14qoB7JyRT9qM3Q99tzvAlmWFM3GrSsG94g4JponQjQWHmr8B eMYezwJHzSI7zWElJpzs/OuohstTYfYTy16FygUOEinc1K4ywjEklgRpXRtjKvqc |
In-reply-to: | <[email protected]> |
Openpgp: | preference=signencrypt |
References: | <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> |
Reply-to: | [email protected] |
Sender: | [email protected] |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
Hi Stefan, Thanks for the ideas. Yes, it makes sense to monitor the system for changes and shut down if any are detected. I guess you want no antenna on that RX, or at least very small antenna. :-) I will add this to my list of things to study. Imagine what could have happened if this failure occurred at a time when I was not checking every few minutes. Hmm... 73, Paul On 1/15/19 5:14 PM, DK7FC wrote: > Hi Paul, > > For VLF i use a protection circuit that monitors the antenna current. If > it suddenly or slowly drops, the transmission is interrupted. This help > to prevent smoking coils. In principle you just need an RX that converts > to audio and ten feed this into SpecLab. There you directly calibrate > the level into Ampere and produce a nice antenna current plot. You will > see which drift and changes are normal and then you can decide at which > level you interprete it as a fault. My circuit needs just 1 second to > stop transmitting after the level has been crossed. > Maybe worth to consider? > > 73, Stefan > > PS: Another technique may be without software: Measure the current of > the PA (DC, input) and the antenna current. Then, compare these two > voltages. If a certain ratio is lost, then stop TXing. There you don't > even need a receiver and complex measurements. > > Am 15.01.2019 22:56, schrieb N1BUG: >> Eventually I will rebuild it perfect... although I would prefer to >> start over with a new coil as this one requires too much >> maintenance. Right now I don't have the luxury of time for any of >> that. It's solar minimum and I need this thing working. :) >> >> I don't trust the inner coil form for HV now, too much carbon: >> >> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-2-1200.jpg >> >> So that'll have to get replaced. I will make the connections >> differently this time! >> >> 73, >> Paul >> >> >> >> On 1/15/19 10:42 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >>> >>> Hello N1BUG, >>> >>> I too have had issues with bolted connections to the variometer. Not >>> an expensive fix so long as you don't mind a few battle scars, but >>> knowing you, you probably want it cosmetically perfect again ;) LF >>> without smoke is QRP... >>> >>> Tuesday, January 15, 2019, 2:50:18 PM, you wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Thanks to all who monitored and provided reports on this latest test >>>> of slow JT9 modes. >>>> >>> >>>> The test ended suddenly around dawn this morning. Here is the reason: >>>> >>> >>>> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-1-1200.jpg >>>> >>> >>>> It's the inner coil from the 2200m loading coil / variometer: >>>> >>> >>>> http://www.n1bug.com/vario-fail-0-1200.jpg >>>> >>> >>>> I had hoped to be on looking for QSOs tonight, but obviously that is >>>> not going to be possible. I do not know when I will be QRV again. >>>> >>> >>>> I have a very busy day today, so the final report on the JT9 test >>>> might not be ready until tomorrow. >>>> >>> >>>> 73, >>>> Paul N1BUG |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | LF: DL7NN WSPR-15, N1BUG |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Chris Wilson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), DK7FC |
Next by Thread: | Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Chris Wilson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |