Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)

from [Chris Wilson]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	N1BUG <[email protected]>
Subject:	Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :)
From:	Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jan 2019 12:11:23 +0000
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JqAkfSOh7HDO8jfTdZdCUDTU1o5jVVUS9duUrFR/pGs=; b=JY8RSV6LOrIfI5S/Zye24s4Z3Y6p13UNJb63ZsA0/Wj0SzHRhY6T+xqYsriMZ4vtZY 6uSiiGCco58BxQsqgeY81p09SbM96lfRhDZQ1TqE4c1KRu+p1azU8rtiL/KRcQ1+242N nuPItupSY6f0qff/S70rQ0VKwFUTctS/cFIAVcABjRvmYd0bnmCLYBEIDSVDqBq3A5Ra Ef2/6+07WLBY3nCqakF4G7v9l36hViGZFLfYj1Al2q+WIM0Jaku5Iv+5IfiAiMZnweU2 5/vToUcsFuGO0LGvTbh+g7XIF7Vd5Rr1izckcxjfXp1+E842hbrJfWcfc0NuLukEh9Od QkeA==
In-reply-to:	<[email protected]>
References:	<[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to:	[email protected]
Sender:	[email protected]


Hello N1BUG,

What  happens  here  is  the  wife  wakes up and says "The wheelie bin
outside is on fire again" tuts and turns over.

Wednesday, January 16, 2019, 11:51:59 AM, you wrote:

> Hi Stefan,

> Thanks for the ideas. Yes, it makes sense to monitor the system for
> changes and shut down if any are detected. I guess you want no
> antenna on that RX, or at least very small antenna. :-) I will add
> this to my list of things to study.

> Imagine what could have happened if this failure occurred at a time
> when I was not checking every few minutes. Hmm...

> 73,
> Paul






-- 
Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:[email protected]

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Chris Wilson Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), DK7FC Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Chris Wilson <= Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), Nan and Sandy Sanders Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG RE: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), VIGILANT Luis Fernández

Previous by Date:	Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG
Next by Date:	Re: LF: Re: EbNaut tonite, [email protected]
Previous by Thread:	Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG
Next by Thread:	Re: LF: JT9-10 vs JT9-5 test ends with smoke :), N1BUG
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]