- 
########################################################################### 
- 
  
- 
I have received similar requests from a few others. We should probably 
- 
address this perceived need before too long. I would like to retire 
- 
WSPR-X, anyway, and do further development within WSJT-X. 
- 
  
- 
I am not persuaded that WSPR-15 is really the best way to go. Here are 
- 
some potentially important questions: 
- 
  
- 
1. Is it clear that in practice WSPR-15 provides LF/MF decodes at lower 
- 
S/N than WSPR-2? If so, ho much lower? 
- 
  
- 
2. Could an equivalent gain in performance be achieved by having the 
- 
decoder average several consecutive, properly synchronized WSPR-2 
- 
transmissions? 
- 
  
- 
3. If a more sensitive WSPR-like mode is truly needed for LF/MF 
- 
experimentation, would it be better to create something that for now 
- 
I'll call "WSPR-MSK", which (like MSK144) uses OQPSK (Offset Quadrature 
- 
Phase-Shift Keying), a constant-envelope waveform, coherent 
- 
demodulation, and an LDPC code? Steve (K9AN) and I have discussed such 
- 
a possible mode, and we might be more motivated to develop that rather 
- 
than going "back" to WSPR-15. I suspect WSPR-MSK could be made as 
- 
sensitive (or better) than WSPR-15, even with transmissions shorter than 
- 
15 minutes. 
- 
  
- 
-- 73, Joe, K1JT