Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: WSPR-15 in WSJT-X

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: WSPR-15 in WSJT-X
From: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 21:49:03 +0000
Accept-language: es-ES, en-US
Authentication-results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass (login) smtp.auth=[email protected]
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AdSCrSIBQQnTWAcERTO1i8YOmQTAZA==
Thread-topic: WSPR-15 in WSJT-X
Hi LF

Regarding this issue there is an answer from Joe, K1JT
Original message follows

73 de Luis
EA5DOM

  1. ###########################################################################
  2.  
  3. I have received similar requests from a few others. We should probably
  4. address this perceived need before too long. I would like to retire
  5. WSPR-X, anyway, and do further development within WSJT-X.
  6.  
  7. I am not persuaded that WSPR-15 is really the best way to go. Here are
  8. some potentially important questions:
  9.  
  10. 1. Is it clear that in practice WSPR-15 provides LF/MF decodes at lower
  11. S/N than WSPR-2? If so, ho much lower?
  12.  
  13. 2. Could an equivalent gain in performance be achieved by having the
  14. decoder average several consecutive, properly synchronized WSPR-2
  15. transmissions?
  16.  
  17. 3. If a more sensitive WSPR-like mode is truly needed for LF/MF
  18. experimentation, would it be better to create something that for now
  19. I'll call "WSPR-MSK", which (like MSK144) uses OQPSK (Offset Quadrature
  20. Phase-Shift Keying), a constant-envelope waveform, coherent
  21. demodulation, and an LDPC code? Steve (K9AN) and I have discussed such
  22. a possible mode, and we might be more motivated to develop that rather
  23. than going "back" to WSPR-15. I suspect WSPR-MSK could be made as
  24. sensitive (or better) than WSPR-15, even with transmissions shorter than
  25. 15 minutes.
  26.  
  27. -- 73, Joe, K1JT
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>