-
###########################################################################
-
-
I have received similar requests from a few others. We should probably
-
address this perceived need before too long. I would like to retire
-
WSPR-X, anyway, and do further development within WSJT-X.
-
-
I am not persuaded that WSPR-15 is really the best way to go. Here are
-
some potentially important questions:
-
-
1. Is it clear that in practice WSPR-15 provides LF/MF decodes at lower
-
S/N than WSPR-2? If so, ho much lower?
-
-
2. Could an equivalent gain in performance be achieved by having the
-
decoder average several consecutive, properly synchronized WSPR-2
-
transmissions?
-
-
3. If a more sensitive WSPR-like mode is truly needed for LF/MF
-
experimentation, would it be better to create something that for now
-
I'll call "WSPR-MSK", which (like MSK144) uses OQPSK (Offset Quadrature
-
Phase-Shift Keying), a constant-envelope waveform, coherent
-
demodulation, and an LDPC code? Steve (K9AN) and I have discussed such
-
a possible mode, and we might be more motivated to develop that rather
-
than going "back" to WSPR-15. I suspect WSPR-MSK could be made as
-
sensitive (or better) than WSPR-15, even with transmissions shorter than
-
15 minutes.
-
-
-- 73, Joe, K1JT