Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: LF: WSPR-15 in WSJT-X

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 in WSJT-X
From: DK7FC <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 00:18:20 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;; s=2017; t=1542928704; bh=AE1qYLNLojy8nOQWuhfgYElFZjgwzaPqAesTIDHbCCY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=A9wWuAIxmkizqIyNJ7iq1t+u4eG6bEAwtgQZns53wwaCai13AxQlH9yv+xnA0JxFR oyLc0Ojil5U7aDcYeHDGII8Wul1Yz64StkiYqgS0kYJJDNE2DF+SRmScBiDayel7W6 6sreVpfktNgcAwVGDr5z1e9n1ruPhmn6zH6zgadLqsDqmBDJC1TlJu+e77ps7ujeLf yR8vXm+N4FsUZP5oxA0ppgaKmnoG7wDsJbJSOu5SKLaBc1lejmJDFCmc2SCvFkkRir 4D02G1SJT9BIdWE89IL4Gies+L3Zhg2ddzq/Hpi46IawsRfXBk8mpMbOSC1AxjettW 1LZaMxrOcdcRg==
In-reply-to: <[email protected]cal>
References: <[email protected]cal>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv: Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3

Am 22.11.2018 22:49, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
  2. 1. Is it clear that in practice WSPR-15 provides LF/MF decodes at lower
  3. S/N than WSPR-2? If so, ho much lower?
Certainly yes. Of course! I've seen decodes at -41 dB shown in the database, and that was with the old decoder.
One mustn't say LF/MF because there is a big difference. WSPR-15 would not perform good on 630m but on 2200m it does, as we can see these days.

73, Stefan
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>