Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.10): tuning issue solve

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.10): tuning issue solved
From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 15:28:30 +0000
Accept-language: nl-BE, en-GB, en-US
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23RktZzwjGcy2MNhKY0X4zbRZ8X3T3fZURWs+iZM=mxcTw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAA8k23Q9yTDFND2EOnZxRh8upOgZ9wf_LX9kuuQm6TTz1WKT-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAA8k23RAZqT9JwNa-mKsWeWwx7ZDGaMrcdGt0XmH1gZkhwQ8-g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
Thread-index: AQHUgObjLHsZQP4DfUWU6/b+f9ZG66VaQt0AgAAU05s=
Thread-topic: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.10): tuning issue solved

​​Hi Paul,


you discovered another but !!!

As mentioned before the max audio limit was set to 1400Hz (to avoid collisions with WSPR). This was done by setting the decoders max. frequency parameter to 1400Hz for JT9-1 and 2800Hz for JT9-2. But since the JT9-2/JT9-1 ratio now is 2.2222 the max. frequency  parameter should be 1400*2.2222 =3111Hz.

Since that isn't done (it's still 2800Hz in version 0.9.10) the maximum JT9-2 frequency is 2800/2.2222 = 1260hZ for now.

This will be fixed in the next release of SlowJT9.


73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T



Van: [email protected] <[email protected]> namens N1BUG [email protected] [rsgb_lf_group] <[email protected]>
Verzonden: woensdag 21 november 2018 15:58
Aan: [email protected]; [email protected]; rsgb_lf_group
Onderwerp: [rsgb_lf_group] Re: LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.10): tuning issue solved
 
 

Update: It seems the new AF limit for JT9-2 is somewhere between
1250 and 1300 Hz. 1250 decodes, 1300 does not.

This may explain why my JT9-10 test did not work. It may not be
possible to get low enough AF for decoding without being below the
SlowJT9 minimum AF.

73,
Paul

__._,_.___

Posted by: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (4)

SPONSORED LINKS
document.write('AOL Ad');
document.write('AOL Ad');
document.write('AOL Ad');
.

__,_._,___
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>