Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

rsgb_lf_group
[Top] [All Lists]

LF: Re: WSPR-15 last night

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: LF: Re: WSPR-15 last night
From: "Steve" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:30:39 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20180605; t=1542738636; bh=4Zx5xa7nHZTVSD+mHNKOHqda/lnyLRKAluWzSRIErZU=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=V5qdBcpMRwz8QR2Vl7d+hevXVIUjFUlzqBEccEkGlwKlnFXu22vxLLSdS0eMA8jOr XbYTM8EErfhgxHUK53nsI/wfdL6CZajHALNYAH/ZXKpDYhf51mf+Azv71FXJJZUQ/C ohx3oU6U8oXLcq3onhuPwwa+SeKT71mDTFy9Lf4b58lCF1N1zZ+oawRRlzdutjlMLu U8Fceu+qEvbS+SzY7GS0n61rGKHFFMgx9EnsBTqwc7aRKuXFzW3JlXTQWlbnUmdntD itmXPxvmyA3zJwZoZRIrqDG0uhZux/g41/XFpYfmvvK1z8J26EkZHG4LgB0Vio7lnp jn4PKiIzcTXvg==
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: [email protected]
Sender: [email protected]
.. is it really wise to just
replace the ones that check bad? I'm leaning toward replacing all
four whenever one or more is dead. Am I being too paranoid?


Paul, FWIW, I've blown a number of the 34NB20s over the years, especially when on the 2200m system. I've always just replaced the blown one only and sparked-up as usual with no ill-effects.

PS, I was likely one of the callers you missed last night as I rarely move to the CQers frequency which I probably should. Being so quiet here, my waterfall doesn't show any signs of crud and I often forget that others may have picked the 'clean' spot at their end for a good reason. You have made an excellent point.


Steve 73



WEB - "The VE7SL Radio Notebook": http://qsl.net/ve7sl/

VE7SL BLOG - "Homebrewing and Operating Adventures From 2200m to Nanowaves": http://ve7sl.blogspot.ca/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>